HTLD vs ULH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTLD is a Hold and ULH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HTLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileULH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HTLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ULH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HTLD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HTLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- ULH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HTLD (@Trucking) experienced а -2.50% price change this week, while ULH (@Trucking) price change was -1.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucking industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
HTLD is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
ULH is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucking (+1.49% weekly)The trucking industry provides road transportation delivery and logistical services, including moving large quantities of raw materials, works in process, and finished goods —often from manufacturing plants to retail distribution centers. Trucks are also used in the construction industry, as they transport large amounts of rocks, concrete, and other building materials used in construction. Trucks in the U.S. are responsible for the majority of freight movement over land, and therefore play an important role in the manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing industries. The business could be affected by economic cycles, since it is closely linked with manufacturing, retail and construction. Some of the major trucking companies in the U.S. are Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., and XPO Logistics, Inc.
| HTLD | ULH | HTLD / ULH | |
| Capitalization | 920M | 1.26B | 73% |
| EBITDA | 179M | 312M | 57% |
| Gain YTD | -17.393 | 72.674 | -24% |
| P/E Ratio | 52.32 | 9.62 | 544% |
| Revenue | 1.08B | 1.77B | 61% |
| Total Cash | 30.7M | 14.9M | 206% |
| Total Debt | 216M | 632M | 34% |
HTLD | ULH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ULH's Valuation (43) in the Trucking industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HTLD (81). This means that ULH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HTLD’s over the last 12 months.
ULH's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Trucking industry is significantly better than the same rating for HTLD (100). This means that ULH’s stock grew significantly faster than HTLD’s over the last 12 months.
ULH's SMR Rating (41) in the Trucking industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HTLD (89). This means that ULH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HTLD’s over the last 12 months.
ULH's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as HTLD (60). This means that ULH’s stock grew similarly to HTLD’s over the last 12 months.
HTLD's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as ULH (28). This means that HTLD’s stock grew similarly to ULH’s over the last 12 months.
| HTLD | ULH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 54% | 8 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 73% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EIPTX | 13.83 | N/A | N/A |
| UBS Engage For Impact P2 | |||
| TOLIX | 16.24 | -0.09 | -0.55% |
| DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Inst | |||
| CSVZX | 35.16 | -0.20 | -0.57% |
| Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst | |||
| ECASX | 29.30 | -0.32 | -1.08% |
| Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C | |||
| POPFX | 28.26 | -0.35 | -1.22% |
| Prospector Opportunity | |||
HTLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTLD has been closely correlated with MRTN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTLD jumps, then MRTN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HTLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTLD | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| MRTN - HTLD | 67% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| WERN - HTLD | 66% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| SNDR - HTLD | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| KNX - HTLD | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| CVLG - HTLD | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
More | ||||
ULH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULH has been loosely correlated with MRTN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULH jumps, then MRTN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ULH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ULH | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| MRTN - ULH | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| CVLG - ULH | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| HTLD - ULH | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| WERN - ULH | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| ODFL - ULH | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||