HTO vs NFRA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTO is a Hold and NFRA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HTO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- HTO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HTO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- HTO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HTO (@Water Utilities) experienced а -5.36% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Water Utilities industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.84%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Water Utilities (-0.64% weekly)Water utilities operate water treatment plants, and/or distribute water to residential and commercial customers. Companies operating in this industry are largely responsible for the safe and timely distribution of water. While most water systems are local or regional, some of the companies might have operations across several states. The industry is expected to be closely monitored by regulators for quality checks on the water being distributed. Investing in upgrading infrastructure is a major factor in bolstering the supply of clean/safe-to-use water. Given the absolute necessity of water in our lives, the industry is largely non-cyclical. American Water Works Company, Inc., Aqua America, Inc., American States Water Co. and California Water Service Group are some of the major water utilities companies in the U.S.
HTO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HTO | NFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 73% |
HTO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTO has been closely correlated with CWT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTO jumps, then CWT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HTO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTO | 100% | -2.27% | ||
| CWT - HTO | 81% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| AWR - HTO | 80% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| YORW - HTO | 75% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| WTRG - HTO | 74% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| MSEX - HTO | 71% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||
NFRA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFRA has been closely correlated with AWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NFRA jumps, then AWK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NFRA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFRA | 100% | -0.92% | ||
| AWK - NFRA | 70% Closely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| EIX - NFRA | 67% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| DTE - NFRA | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| HTO - NFRA | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| PPL - NFRA | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
More | ||||