HTZ
Price
$7.29
Change
+$0.12 (+1.67%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.39B
34 days until earnings call
IMMFF
Price
$0.88
Change
+$0.38 (+76.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
538.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HTZ vs IMMFF

Header iconHTZ vs IMMFF Comparison
Open Charts HTZ vs IMMFFBanner chart's image
Hertz Global Holdings
Price$7.29
Change+$0.12 (+1.67%)
Volume$4.97M
Capitalization2.39B
OMNI BRIDGEWAY
Price$0.88
Change+$0.38 (+76.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization538.28M
HTZ vs IMMFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IMMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTZ vs. IMMFF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTZ is a Buy and IMMFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HTZ: $7.29 vs. IMMFF: $0.88)
Brand notoriety: HTZ and IMMFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTZ: 54% vs. IMMFF: 317%
Market capitalization -- HTZ: $2.39B vs. IMMFF: $538.28M
HTZ [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $2.39B. IMMFF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $538.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIMMFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IMMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IMMFF is a better buy in the long-term than HTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IMMFF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IMMFF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTZ is a better buy in the short-term than IMMFF.

Price Growth

HTZ (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -3.57% price change this week, while IMMFF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

HTZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+2.32% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HTZ($2.39B) has a higher market cap than IMMFF($538M). IMMFF has higher P/E ratio than HTZ: IMMFF (41.67) vs HTZ (5.53). HTZ YTD gains are higher at: 99.180 vs. IMMFF (75.420). HTZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.65B vs. IMMFF (-13.89M). HTZ has more cash in the bank: 764M vs. IMMFF (159M). IMMFF has less debt than HTZ: IMMFF (162M) vs HTZ (17.8B). HTZ has higher revenues than IMMFF: HTZ (9.37B) vs IMMFF (30.8M).
HTZIMMFFHTZ / IMMFF
Capitalization2.39B538M444%
EBITDA3.65B-13.89M-26,284%
Gain YTD99.18075.420132%
P/E Ratio5.5341.6713%
Revenue9.37B30.8M30,425%
Total Cash764M159M481%
Total Debt17.8B162M10,988%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMMFF: Fundamental Ratings
IMMFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
36
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTZIMMFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
3%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IMMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVHIX5.96N/A
N/A
Macquarie High Income Fund Class I
EAAAX16.38N/A
N/A
Gabelli Entpr Mergers & Acquisitions AAA
TRNZX22.29N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price International Stock Z
CIGRX23.24N/A
N/A
Calamos International Growth A
BLDIX9.62N/A
N/A
BlackRock Managed Income Institutional

HTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTZ has been loosely correlated with CAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HTZ jumps, then CAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTZ
1D Price
Change %
HTZ100%
+1.67%
CAR - HTZ
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
BBDC - HTZ
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
LC - HTZ
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
RKT - HTZ
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
OMF - HTZ
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More

IMMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMMFF and SHGKY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMMFF and SHGKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMMFF
1D Price
Change %
IMMFF100%
N/A
SHGKY - IMMFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
UPST - IMMFF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
LU - IMMFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
HTZ - IMMFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
LDI - IMMFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.03%
More