HTZ
Price
$5.88
Change
+$0.05 (+0.86%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.39B
49 days until earnings call
MIUFY
Price
$14.62
Change
-$0.11 (-0.75%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
9.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HTZ vs MIUFY

Header iconHTZ vs MIUFY Comparison
Open Charts HTZ vs MIUFYBanner chart's image
Hertz Global Holdings
Price$5.88
Change+$0.05 (+0.86%)
Volume$4.39M
Capitalization2.39B
Mitsubishi HC Capital
Price$14.62
Change-$0.11 (-0.75%)
Volume$723
Capitalization9.59B
HTZ vs MIUFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTZ vs. MIUFY commentary
Jun 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTZ is a Hold and MIUFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 19, 2025
Stock price -- (HTZ: $5.88 vs. MIUFY: $14.62)
Brand notoriety: HTZ and MIUFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTZ: 22% vs. MIUFY: 105%
Market capitalization -- HTZ: $2.39B vs. MIUFY: $9.59B
HTZ [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $2.39B. MIUFY’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $9.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMIUFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MIUFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MIUFY is a better buy in the long-term than HTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTZ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HTZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

HTZ (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -7.55% price change this week, while MIUFY (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

HTZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

MIUFY is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.93% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIUFY($9.59B) has a higher market cap than HTZ($2.39B). MIUFY has higher P/E ratio than HTZ: MIUFY (7.67) vs HTZ (5.53). HTZ YTD gains are higher at: 60.656 vs. MIUFY (18.381). MIUFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 159B vs. HTZ (3.65B). MIUFY has more cash in the bank: 548B vs. HTZ (764M). HTZ has less debt than MIUFY: HTZ (17.8B) vs MIUFY (7.89T). MIUFY has higher revenues than HTZ: MIUFY (1.86T) vs HTZ (9.37B).
HTZMIUFYHTZ / MIUFY
Capitalization2.39B9.59B25%
EBITDA3.65B159B2%
Gain YTD60.65618.381330%
P/E Ratio5.537.6772%
Revenue9.37B1.86T1%
Total Cash764M548B0%
Total Debt17.8B7.89T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MIUFY: Fundamental Ratings
MIUFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
29
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGFSX17.72N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Financial Services A
CFMSX11.18N/A
N/A
Column Mid Cap Select
LCMRX40.54N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Mid Cap Growth R
FHJUX42.66N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Europe A
CVSOX15.31-0.01
-0.07%
Calamos Market Neutral Income R6

HTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTZ has been loosely correlated with CAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HTZ jumps, then CAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTZ
1D Price
Change %
HTZ100%
+0.86%
CAR - HTZ
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
BBDC - HTZ
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
LC - HTZ
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.00%
RKT - HTZ
35%
Loosely correlated
+4.55%
OMF - HTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
More

MIUFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MIUFY and COOP have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MIUFY and COOP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIUFY
1D Price
Change %
MIUFY100%
N/A
COOP - MIUFY
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.54%
EDNMF - MIUFY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFSI - MIUFY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
HTZ - MIUFY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
WLFC - MIUFY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
More