HTZ
Price
$5.84
Change
+$0.16 (+2.82%)
Updated
Aug 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.82B
57 days until earnings call
MIUFY
Price
$16.50
Change
+$1.22 (+7.98%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
11.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HTZ vs MIUFY

Header iconHTZ vs MIUFY Comparison
Open Charts HTZ vs MIUFYBanner chart's image
Hertz Global Holdings
Price$5.84
Change+$0.16 (+2.82%)
Volume$41.4K
Capitalization1.82B
Mitsubishi HC Capital
Price$16.50
Change+$1.22 (+7.98%)
Volume$212
Capitalization11.76B
HTZ vs MIUFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIUFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTZ vs. MIUFY commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTZ is a StrongBuy and MIUFY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HTZ: $5.85 vs. MIUFY: $16.38)
Brand notoriety: HTZ and MIUFY are both not notable
HTZ represents the Finance/Rental/Leasing, while MIUFY is part of the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTZ: 60% vs. MIUFY: 57%
Market capitalization -- HTZ: $1.82B vs. MIUFY: $11.76B
HTZ [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.82B. MIUFY’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $11.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $61.08B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $7.71B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMIUFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MIUFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MIUFY is a better buy in the long-term than HTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MIUFY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MIUFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTZ is a better buy in the short-term than MIUFY.

Price Growth

HTZ (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +6.17% price change this week, while MIUFY (@Savings Banks) price change was +0.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +5.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.50%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +3.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

HTZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+5.58% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

@Savings Banks (+3.92% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIUFY($11.8B) has a higher market cap than HTZ($1.82B). HTZ has higher P/E ratio than MIUFY: HTZ (22.21) vs MIUFY (12.88). HTZ YTD gains are higher at: 55.191 vs. MIUFY (33.603). MIUFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 576B vs. HTZ (1.13B). MIUFY has more cash in the bank: 385B vs. HTZ (503M). HTZ has less debt than MIUFY: HTZ (19.9B) vs MIUFY (7.99T). MIUFY has higher revenues than HTZ: MIUFY (2.08T) vs HTZ (8.61B).
HTZMIUFYHTZ / MIUFY
Capitalization1.82B11.8B15%
EBITDA1.13B576B0%
Gain YTD55.19133.603164%
P/E Ratio22.2112.88172%
Revenue8.61B2.08T0%
Total Cash503M385B0%
Total Debt19.9B7.99T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MIUFY: Fundamental Ratings
MIUFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTZMIUFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIUFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BFTHX62.710.24
+0.38%
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Retail
MCDCX21.540.04
+0.19%
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv C
HGISX59.45N/A
N/A
Hartford Core Equity R4
BGCSX15.72N/A
N/A
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap I
FEMAX11.89N/A
N/A
First Eagle U.S. SMID Cap Opportunity A

HTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTZ has been loosely correlated with CAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HTZ jumps, then CAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTZ
1D Price
Change %
HTZ100%
+1.97%
CAR - HTZ
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
BBDC - HTZ
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
LC - HTZ
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
NAVI - HTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
OMF - HTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
More

MIUFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MIUFY and EDNMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MIUFY and EDNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIUFY
1D Price
Change %
MIUFY100%
N/A
EDNMF - MIUFY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTZ - MIUFY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
WLFC - MIUFY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
EHMEF - MIUFY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRAA - MIUFY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
More