Advertisement
HUN vs LYB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Huntsman Corporation (HUN) vs. LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HUN has shown stronger short-term momentum with a 3% gain over the recent month, while LYB experienced an 11.8% pullback in the same period.
- LYB boasts superior year-to-date performance at approximately 68%, outpacing HUN's 38% gain, reflecting robust sector recovery.
- LYB offers a higher dividend yield of 6.76% compared to HUN's 2.55%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- Both stocks trade at low valuations relative to sales (HUN 0.42, LYB 0.75), amid challenging profitability in the chemicals sector.
- Recent expansions, such as HUN's Hungary facility and LYB's operational improvements, signal capacity growth in a recovering market.
- LYB's larger market cap (over $23B vs. HUN's $2.4B) provides greater scale but higher debt-to-equity (144% vs. 81%).
Introduction
This comparison examines HUN and LYB, two prominent players in the chemicals sector specializing in polyolefins, specialties, and advanced materials. Both companies navigate volatile commodity prices, supply chain dynamics, and demand from end-markets like packaging, automotive, and construction. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing dividends or sector recovery will find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuations, and catalysts. Amid recent market rebounds, understanding their positioning helps assess trade-offs in growth potential, risk, and income generation in today's environment.
HUN Overview and Recent Performance
HUN, or Huntsman Corporation, manufactures differentiated organic and inorganic chemicals, including polyurethanes, performance products, and advanced materials for diverse applications. In recent market activity, the stock has climbed about 38% year-to-date, with a 3% rise over the recent month and 20% in three months, trading near its 52-week high of $14.38 from a low of $7.30. Sentiment has improved due to capacity expansions, notably the grand opening of an operational unit in Petfurdo, Hungary, enhancing specialty amines production. Upcoming first-quarter earnings on May 1, 2026, are anticipated to show earnings declines, but analyst targets average $12.69, with some upgrades. Trading at a price-to-sales ratio of 0.42 and beta of 0.60 (indicating lower volatility than the market), HUN reflects cautious optimism amid sector headwinds like negative profitability margins.
LYB Overview and Recent Performance
LYB, LyondellBasell Industries N.V., is a leading global producer of plastics, chemicals, and refined products, with a focus on olefins, polyolefins, and oxyfuels. The stock has surged roughly 68% year-to-date, despite a recent 11.8% monthly dip, with 40% three-month gains, oscillating between a 52-week low of $41.58 and high of $83.94. Positive sentiment stems from analyst upgrades, including Morgan Stanley's overweight rating and $77 target, alongside petrochemical supply tightness. Operational enhancements, like the La Porte acetyls unit turnaround, support long-term reliability. With first-quarter earnings due May 1, 2026, and EPS forecasts down slightly year-over-year, LYB's appeal lies in its 6.76% dividend yield, price-to-sales of 0.75, and beta of 0.44, though profitability challenges persist.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across various styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. These elite selections adapt to current market conditions, featuring diverse approaches like pattern recognition, momentum trading, and swing strategies with reported win rates, profit factors, and trade volumes tailored for stocks, ETFs, and more. For instance, bots may show high win rates in volatile sectors like chemicals, helping users identify opportunities in tickers such as HUN or LYB. Explore this section to discover bots suited to your risk tolerance and market outlook, potentially enhancing trading efficiency with data-driven signals.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both HUN and LYB operate in the cyclical chemicals sector but differ in scale and focus: HUN emphasizes specialty chemicals with higher margins potential, while LYB dominates commodity polyolefins with broader refining exposure. Growth drivers include HUN's targeted expansions versus LYB's global turnarounds. Recent momentum favors HUN short-term, but LYB leads in three-month and YTD gains. Risk profiles show similar low betas but LYB's higher debt-to-equity (144% vs. 81%) and larger enterprise value ($33.7B vs. $4B). Sector exposure overlaps in packaging and autos, yet LYB benefits more from supply constraints. Market sentiment tilts toward LYB with higher analyst targets and dividend allure, contrasting HUN's neutral ratings, highlighting trade-offs between momentum and stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward LYB based on superior year-to-date trend consistency (68% gains), higher dividend yield for income stability, larger market positioning, and positive analyst momentum amid supply catalysts. While HUN offers recent outperformance and lower leverage, LYB's scale and relative strength suggest higher probability of sustained upside in a chemicals rebound, though both warrant monitoring post-earnings.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUN is a StrongBuy and LYB is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLYB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HUN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LYB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LYB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HUN (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) experienced а +5.75% price change this week, while LYB (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -4.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -4.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.45%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
LYB is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-4.17% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.11% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| HUN | LYB | HUN / LYB | |
| Capitalization | 2.64B | 20.5B | 13% |
| EBITDA | 124M | 1.29B | 10% |
| Gain YTD | 51.838 | 49.914 | 104% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 98.77 | - |
| Revenue | 5.69B | 29.7B | 19% |
| Total Cash | 369M | 2.64B | 14% |
| Total Debt | 2.49B | 14.3B | 17% |
HUN | LYB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LYB's Valuation (8) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as HUN (10) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LYB’s stock grew similarly to HUN’s over the last 12 months.
LYB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as HUN (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LYB’s stock grew similarly to HUN’s over the last 12 months.
LYB's SMR Rating (95) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as HUN (95) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LYB’s stock grew similarly to HUN’s over the last 12 months.
HUN's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LYB (49) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew similarly to LYB’s over the last 12 months.
HUN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LYB (2) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew similarly to LYB’s over the last 12 months.
| HUN | LYB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 10 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 58% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CPNJ | 27.53 | 0.11 | +0.41% |
| Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jun | |||
| DSM | 6.11 | 0.01 | +0.16% |
| BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal | |||
| CPNM | 26.74 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Mar | |||
| MLPA | 53.95 | -0.39 | -0.72% |
| Global X MLP ETF | |||
| FNGD | 37.27 | -3.40 | -8.36% |
| MicroSectors™ FANG+™ -3X Invrs Lvrgd ETN | |||
HUN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUN has been closely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUN jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.
LYB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYB has been closely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYB jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.