HVT
Price
$22.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
551.83M
31 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$54.54
Change
-$0.96 (-1.73%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HVT vs RUSHA

Header iconHVT vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts HVT vs RUSHABanner chart's image
Haverty Furniture Companies
Price$22.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$539
Capitalization551.83M
Rush Enterprises
Price$54.54
Change-$0.96 (-1.73%)
Volume$321.24K
Capitalization4.12B
HVT vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HVT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HVT vs. RUSHA commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HVT is a Buy and RUSHA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (HVT: $22.40 vs. RUSHA: $54.54)
Brand notoriety: HVT and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HVT: 48% vs. RUSHA: 68%
Market capitalization -- HVT: $551.83M vs. RUSHA: $4.12B
HVT [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $551.83M. RUSHA’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HVT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HVT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than HVT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HVT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HVT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than HVT.

Price Growth

HVT (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +9.27% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Specialty Stores) price change was +6.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +3.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

HVT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+3.73% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHA($4.12B) has a higher market cap than HVT($552M). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than HVT: RUSHA (12.75) vs HVT (9.88). HVT YTD gains are higher at: 3.706 vs. RUSHA (0.226). RUSHA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 737M vs. HVT (85.9M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. HVT (121M). HVT has less debt than RUSHA: HVT (218M) vs RUSHA (1.81B). RUSHA has higher revenues than HVT: RUSHA (7.93B) vs HVT (862M).
HVTRUSHAHVT / RUSHA
Capitalization552M4.12B13%
EBITDA85.9M737M12%
Gain YTD3.7060.2261,639%
P/E Ratio9.8812.7577%
Revenue862M7.93B11%
Total Cash121M184M66%
Total Debt218M1.81B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HVT vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
HVT
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2039
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6416
SMR RATING
1..100
7956
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1017
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HVT's Valuation (11) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (25) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that HVT’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVT (64) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVT’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's SMR Rating (56) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as HVT (79) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to HVT’s over the last 12 months.

HVT's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (49) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that HVT’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

HVT's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (17) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that HVT’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HVTRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HVT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZVNBX42.090.58
+1.40%
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
RGOIX22.710.21
+0.93%
RBC Global Opportunities I
VSCNX21.300.16
+0.76%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap N
UIVQX12.830.09
+0.71%
MFS Intrinsic Value R4
FERGX15.840.06
+0.38%
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index

HVT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HVT has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HVT jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVT
1D Price
Change %
HVT100%
+1.13%
PAG - HVT
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
RUSHA - HVT
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
HZO - HVT
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
GPI - HVT
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
ABG - HVT
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
-1.73%
RUSHB - RUSHA
86%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
LAD - RUSHA
69%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
ABG - RUSHA
69%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
AN - RUSHA
68%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
PAG - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
More