Advertisement
HVT vs RH
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Haverty Furniture Companies (HVT) vs. RH (RH) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HVT has delivered stronger year-to-date gains of approximately 24-27% compared to RH's decline of around 17% through early September 2026.
- HVT reported robust second-quarter 2026 results with net sales rising 7.7% and EPS doubling year-over-year, while maintaining a debt-free balance sheet with substantial cash reserves.
- RH, operating in the luxury home furnishings segment, exhibits higher volatility with a 52-week range of $106.30 to $253.05 and carries significant debt levels exceeding $4 billion.
- Both companies operate in the home furnishings retail sector but differ in scale, with RH holding a market capitalization of about $2.8 billion versus HVT's roughly $0.44 billion.
- HVT offers an attractive dividend yield near 4.7%, supported by ongoing share repurchases, contrasting with RH's focus on premium positioning and gallery expansions.
- Market sentiment has favored HVT's stability and earnings consistency in recent weeks amid broader sector challenges.
Introduction
This comparison examines HVT and RH, two publicly traded companies in the home furnishings retail space, to highlight their relative performance and positioning in the current market. Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. focuses on mid-to-upper-middle price furnishings primarily in the Southern and Midwestern U.S., while RH emphasizes luxury home products through an experiential retail model. Institutional investors, retail traders, and sector analysts monitoring consumer discretionary trends may find this analysis relevant for assessing risk-adjusted opportunities and sector exposure within home goods.
HVT Overview and Recent Performance
Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. operates as a specialty retailer of residential furniture and accessories across the United States. In recent weeks, the stock has traded near $28.50, reflecting gains driven by solid second-quarter 2026 earnings that exceeded expectations, with net sales increasing 7.7% to $194.9 million and diluted EPS doubling to $0.32. The company ended the quarter with $111 million in cash, no funded debt, and active share repurchases totaling $16.6 million in the first half of the year. Broader market activity has supported sentiment through consistent revenue growth and a healthy balance sheet, with the stock maintaining a 52-week range of $19.89 to $29.83 and offering a dividend yield around 4.7%.
RH Overview and Recent Performance
RH, a luxury home furnishings retailer, has seen its shares fluctuate around $148 in recent weeks amid ongoing sector pressures. Performance has been marked by volatility, with the stock posting a year-to-date decline near 17% as of early September 2026, within a wide 52-week range of $106.30 to $253.05. The company continues to pursue gallery expansions and international initiatives, though elevated debt levels above $4 billion and upcoming second-quarter fiscal 2026 earnings, scheduled for release on September 10, 2026, have influenced market positioning. Recent activity reflects mixed sentiment tied to macroeconomic factors affecting high-end consumer spending.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics, with only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Available bots demonstrate a range of historical returns and risk profiles, allowing users to explore options aligned with specific objectives. The platform provides transparent statistics on win rates, drawdowns, and trade volumes to support informed evaluation. Review the Trending AI Robots for current selections.
Head-to-Head Comparison
HVT and RH contrast sharply in business models: HVT targets regional mid-market consumers with a debt-free structure and dividend focus, while RH pursues premium experiential retail with greater scale but higher leverage. Recent momentum favors HVT’s earnings-driven stability over RH’s volatility and YTD underperformance. Sector exposure overlaps in home furnishings, yet RH faces amplified sensitivity to luxury spending cycles. Risk factors include RH’s elevated debt versus HVT’s conservative capitalization. Market sentiment has tilted toward HVT’s consistency amid shared industry headwinds.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, balance sheet stability, and recent earnings catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models would likely assign a higher probabilistic preference to HVT in the current environment. Its lower leverage and positive relative performance provide a more resilient profile compared to RH’s volatility, though outcomes remain subject to broader market dynamics and sector conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HVT is a Hold and RH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HVT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HVT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HVT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HVT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HVT (@Home Improvement Chains) experienced а +4.39% price change this week, while RH (@Specialty Stores) price change was -1.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.96%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.08%.
Reported Earning Dates
HVT is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
RH is expected to report earnings on Sep 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Home Improvement Chains (-1.37% weekly)The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.
@Specialty Stores (+2.27% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| HVT | RH | HVT / RH | |
| Capitalization | 446M | 2.8B | 16% |
| EBITDA | 50.4M | 520M | 10% |
| Gain YTD | 27.415 | -17.393 | -158% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.70 | 28.57 | 72% |
| Revenue | 780M | 3.43B | 23% |
| Total Cash | 104M | 53.8M | 193% |
| Total Debt | 231M | 4.02B | 6% |
HVT | RH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 22 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HVT's Valuation (8) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RH (81). This means that HVT’s stock grew significantly faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.
HVT's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (100). This means that HVT’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.
RH's SMR Rating (33) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVT (77). This means that RH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVT’s over the last 12 months.
HVT's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (64). This means that HVT’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.
HVT's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RH (93). This means that HVT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.
| HVT | RH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 68% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RMOP | 24.62 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Rockefeller Opportunistic Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| BDCX | 20.89 | N/A | N/A |
| ETRACS Qrtly Py 1.5X Lvgd Wls Fg BDC ETN | |||
| AOTS | 23.25 | N/A | N/A |
| AOT Software Platform ETF | |||
| MKTN | 27.75 | -0.05 | -0.18% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF | |||
| ARKB | 26.47 | -0.65 | -2.40% |
| ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | |||
HVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HVT has been loosely correlated with LOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HVT jumps, then LOW could also see price increases.