HWC
Price
$54.37
Change
+$1.12 (+2.10%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
24 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$23.77
Change
+$0.60 (+2.59%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HWC vs RF

Header iconHWC vs RF Comparison
Open Charts HWC vs RFBanner chart's image
Hancock Whitney
Price$54.37
Change+$1.12 (+2.10%)
Volume$21.08K
CapitalizationN/A
Regions Financial
Price$23.77
Change+$0.60 (+2.59%)
Volume$29.52M
CapitalizationN/A
HWC vs RF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWC vs. RF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWC is a Hold and RF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (HWC: $54.38 vs. RF: $23.77)
Brand notoriety: HWC: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWC: 361% vs. RF: 356%
Market capitalization -- HWC: $4B vs. RF: $18.9B
HWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than RF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the short-term than RF.

Price Growth

HWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.88% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($18.9B) has a higher market cap than HWC($4B). HWC (9.98) and RF (9.74) have similar P/E ratio . RF YTD gains are higher at: 28.353 vs. HWC (15.352). RF has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. HWC (561M). HWC has less debt than RF: HWC (1.52B) vs RF (2.33B). RF has higher revenues than HWC: RF (7.57B) vs HWC (1.37B).
HWCRFHWC / RF
Capitalization4B18.9B21%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.35228.35354%
P/E Ratio9.989.74102%
Revenue1.37B7.57B18%
Total Cash561M1.55B36%
Total Debt1.52B2.33B65%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HWC vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
HWC
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8774
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4128
SMR RATING
1..100
107
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2819
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (77) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (10) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

RF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (28) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWCRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HWMZX54.020.62
+1.16%
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
TSLRX6.420.05
+0.78%
Transamerica Small Cap Value R6
THOFX35.950.05
+0.14%
Thornburg Global Opportunities R5
USDAUD1.60N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Australian Dollar
HKDEUR0.12N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - Euro

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
+2.12%
ASB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
CADE - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
FNB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
UBSI - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
ABCB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
More