Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMEBX
HWCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value A
Price$32.38
Change-$0.17 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.49M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.45
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
HWCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. HWCAX (82.5M). HWCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCAX (1.44) vs RMEBX (1.05). HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCAX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). HWCAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.96 vs. HWCAX (1.34). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 108.65 vs. RMEBX (58.09).
| HWCAX | RMEBX | HWCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.07 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.07 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.139 | 14.628 | 90% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.5M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.05 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.34 | 7.96 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.98 | 43.02 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.65 | 58.09 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.56 | 92.06 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement