Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMEBX
HWCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value A
Price$31.42
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.14M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.27
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
HWCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. HWCAX (79.1M). HWCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCAX (1.45) vs RMEBX (1.05). HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCAX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). HWCAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. HWCAX (-5.44). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 75.62 vs. RMEBX (50.76).
| HWCAX | RMEBX | HWCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.07 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.933 | 12.462 | 72% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.1M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.05 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.44 | 5.45 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.05 | 27.22 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.62 | 50.76 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.29 | 82.68 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement