Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMEBX
HWCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMEBX
HWCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HWCAX (90M). HWCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCAX (1.19) vs RMEBX (0.99). HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCAX (22 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HWCAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). HWCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.54 vs. RMEBX (9.03). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.16 vs. RMEBX (35.75).
| HWCAX | RMEBX | HWCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.07 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.875 | 10.367 | 172% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.99 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.54 | 9.03 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.50 | 38.30 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.16 | 35.75 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.70 | 90.55 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers