Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMEBX
HWCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMEBX
HWCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWCAX (88.1M). HWCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCAX (1.13) vs RMEBX (0.99). HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCAX (22 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HWCAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). HWCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.57 vs. RMEBX (4.65). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.78 vs. RMEBX (34.68).
| HWCAX | RMEBX | HWCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.07 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.889 | 8.448 | 188% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.1M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.99 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.57 | 4.65 | 227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.52 | 34.88 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.78 | 34.68 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.90 | 92.45 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers