Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMFCX
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value A
Price$31.72
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.56M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HWCAX (80.6M). HWCAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCAX (1.53) vs RMFCX (1.26). HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCAX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HWCAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. HWCAX (-1.27). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 102.17 vs. RMFCX (54.21).
| HWCAX | RMFCX | HWCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.91 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.91 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.358 | 11.642 | 89% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.26 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.27 | 6.98 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.95 | 29.24 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.17 | 54.21 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.43 | 91.22 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement