Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMFCX
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value A
Price$31.42
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.14M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.93
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. HWCAX (79.1M). HWCAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCAX (1.45) vs RMFCX (1.21). HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCAX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HWCAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. HWCAX (-5.44). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 75.62 vs. RMFCX (51.85).
| HWCAX | RMFCX | HWCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.933 | 12.617 | 71% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.1M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.21 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.44 | 5.59 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.05 | 27.75 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.62 | 51.85 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.29 | 84.46 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers