Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMFCX
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value A
Price$29.86
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.45M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.54B
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HWCAX (76.5M). HWCAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCAX (1.53) vs RMFCX (1.26). HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCAX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HWCAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.08 vs. HWCAX (-0.04). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 94.55 vs. RMFCX (54.27).
| HWCAX | RMFCX | HWCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.91 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.91 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.893 | 9.394 | 41% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.5M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.26 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.04 | 11.08 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.42 | 25.54 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.55 | 54.27 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.97 | 76.20 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement