Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMFCX
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMFCX
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWCAX (88.1M). RMFCX (1.15) and HWCAX (1.13) have matching dividends . HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HWCAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). HWCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.57 vs. RMFCX (4.75). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.78 vs. RMFCX (35.61).
| HWCAX | RMFCX | HWCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.889 | 8.539 | 186% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.1M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.15 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.57 | 4.75 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.52 | 35.38 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.78 | 35.61 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.90 | 94.16 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers