Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMFCX
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMFCX
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HWCAX (90M). HWCAX (1.19) and RMFCX (1.15) have matching dividends . HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HWCAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). HWCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.54 vs. RMFCX (9.14). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.16 vs. RMFCX (36.70).
| HWCAX | RMFCX | HWCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.875 | 10.454 | 171% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.15 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.54 | 9.14 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.50 | 38.82 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.16 | 36.70 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.70 | 92.27 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers