Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMFCX
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMFCX
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWCAX (84.6M). HWCAX (1.24) and RMFCX (1.19) have matching dividends . HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HWCAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). HWCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. RMFCX (9.31). RMFCX (34.71) and HWCAX (34.13) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HWCAX | RMFCX | HWCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.268 | 6.953 | 133% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.6M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.19 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | 9.31 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.93 | 34.52 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.13 | 34.71 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.57 | 94.50 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers