Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMFEX
HWCAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMFEX
HWCAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWCAX (88.1M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than HWCAX: RMFEX (1.41) vs HWCAX (1.13). HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HWCAX (22 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). HWCAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMFEX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). HWCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.57 vs. RMFEX (5.11). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.78 vs. RMFEX (37.76).
| HWCAX | RMFEX | HWCAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.62 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.62 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.889 | 8.776 | 181% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.1M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.41 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.57 | 5.11 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.52 | 36.71 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.78 | 37.76 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.90 | 102.44 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers