Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMFEX
HWCAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMFEX
HWCAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HWCAX (84.2M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than HWCAX: RMFEX (1.42) vs HWCAX (1.25). HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HWCAX (22 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). HWCAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMFEX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). HWCAX (9.43) and RMFEX (9.23) have marching annual gain over last year. HWCAX (39.60) and RMFEX (39.39) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HWCAX | RMFEX | HWCAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.62 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.62 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.937 | 9.303 | 96% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.2M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.42 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.43 | 9.23 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.86 | 36.13 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.60 | 39.39 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.11 | 99.14 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers