Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMFEX
HWCAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMFEX
HWCAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWCAX (84.6M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than HWCAX: RMFEX (1.45) vs HWCAX (1.24). HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HWCAX (22 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). HWCAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMFEX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). HWCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. RMFEX (9.66). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. HWCAX (34.13).
| HWCAX | RMFEX | HWCAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.62 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.62 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.268 | 7.089 | 131% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.6M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.45 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | 9.66 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.93 | 35.77 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.13 | 36.84 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.57 | 102.59 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers