HWH
Price
$2.08
Change
-$0.11 (-5.02%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
16.07M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PLBY
Price
$1.22
Change
-$0.01 (-0.81%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
146.17M
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HWH vs PLBY

HWH vs PLBY Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWH vs. PLBY commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWH is a Hold and PLBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (HWH: $2.08 vs. PLBY: $1.22)
Brand notoriety: HWH and PLBY are both not notable
HWH represents the Restaurants, while PLBY is part of the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWH: 15% vs. PLBY: 46%
Market capitalization -- HWH: $16.07M vs. PLBY: $146.17M
HWH [@Restaurants] is valued at $16.07M. PLBY’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $146.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $191.74B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $27.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.55B. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $2.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLBY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HWH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLBY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWH is a better buy in the long-term than PLBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWH’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLBY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWH’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWH is a better buy in the short-term than PLBY.

Price Growth

HWH (@Restaurants) experienced а +14.92% price change this week, while PLBY (@Recreational Products) price change was -3.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.51%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLBY is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.26% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

@Recreational Products (-0.06% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLBY($146M) has a higher market cap than HWH($16.1M). PLBY has higher P/E ratio than HWH: PLBY (61.00) vs HWH (6.74). HWH YTD gains are higher at: 39.597 vs. PLBY (-35.106). PLBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.27M vs. HWH (-2.66M). PLBY has more cash in the bank: 30.2M vs. HWH (1.62M). HWH has less debt than PLBY: HWH (206K) vs PLBY (178M). PLBY has higher revenues than HWH: PLBY (122M) vs HWH (390K).
HWHPLBYHWH / PLBY
Capitalization16.1M146M11%
EBITDA-2.66M8.27M-32%
Gain YTD39.597-35.106-113%
P/E Ratio6.7461.0011%
Revenue390K122M0%
Total Cash1.62M30.2M5%
Total Debt206K178M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLBY: Fundamental Ratings
PLBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWHPLBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HWH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFPRX58.330.62
+1.07%
Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Institutional
TGBLX12.640.12
+0.96%
T. Rowe Price Global Impact Equity I
GABVX13.300.11
+0.83%
Gabelli Value 25 A
JVAQX43.230.23
+0.53%
JPMorgan Value Advantage R4
BMCIX32.700.08
+0.25%
BlackRock High Equity Income Instl

HWH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWH and DOGZ have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWH and DOGZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWH
1D Price
Change %
HWH100%
-5.02%
DOGZ - HWH
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
MAT - HWH
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
CHSN - HWH
9%
Poorly correlated
+5.45%
PLBY - HWH
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
BTBD - HWH
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
More

PLBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLBY and HAS have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLBY and HAS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLBY
1D Price
Change %
PLBY100%
-0.81%
HAS - PLBY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
JAKK - PLBY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
CALY - PLBY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
FNKO - PLBY
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.50%
PRKS - PLBY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
More