Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWLAX vs RMEBX
HWLAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWLAX vs RMEBX
HWLAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWLAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWLAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWLAX (379M). HWLAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWLAX (1.20) vs RMEBX (0.99). HWLAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWLAX (25 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HWLAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLAX: RMEBX (250) vs HWLAX (2500). HWLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.07 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. HWLAX (28.37).
| HWLAX | RMEBX | HWLAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.845 | 8.448 | 176% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.99 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | 4.65 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.52 | 34.88 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.37 | 34.68 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.90 | 92.45 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement