Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWLAX vs RMEBX
HWLAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWLAX vs RMEBX
HWLAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWLAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWLAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HWLAX (375M). HWLAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWLAX (1.26) vs RMEBX (0.99). HWLAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWLAX (25 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HWLAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLAX: RMEBX (250) vs HWLAX (2500). HWLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.41 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. HWLAX (23.38).
| HWLAX | RMEBX | HWLAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.201 | 9.416 | 119% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 375M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.99 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.41 | 8.96 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.39 | 32.63 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.38 | 36.13 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.41 | 90.64 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement