Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWLIX vs RMEBX
HWLIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWLIX vs RMEBX
HWLIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWLIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWLIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HWLIX (387M). HWLIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWLIX (1.55) vs RMEBX (0.99). HWLIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWLIX (39 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HWLIX (0.98). HWLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLIX: RMEBX (250) vs HWLIX (250000). HWLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.05 vs. RMEBX (9.44). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.32 vs. HWLIX (29.79).
| HWLIX | RMEBX | HWLIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.07 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.318 | 10.825 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 387M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 0.99 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.05 | 9.44 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.31 | 38.42 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.79 | 36.32 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.01 | 91.39 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement