Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWLIX vs RMEBX
HWLIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWLIX vs RMEBX
HWLIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWLIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWLIX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWLIX (379M). HWLIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWLIX (1.48) vs RMEBX (0.99). HWLIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWLIX (39 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HWLIX (0.98). HWLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLIX: RMEBX (250) vs HWLIX (250000). HWLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.36 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. HWLIX (29.68).
| HWLIX | RMEBX | HWLIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.07 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.029 | 8.448 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 0.99 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.36 | 4.65 | 287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.57 | 34.88 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.68 | 34.68 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.61 | 92.45 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement