Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSCX vs SSGSX
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSCX vs SSGSX
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.32B vs. HWSCX (890M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than HWSCX: SSGSX (0.52) vs HWSCX (0.07). HWSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSCX (25 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). HWSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. HWSCX (41.00). HWSCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HWSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.57 vs. SSGSX (14.73). HWSCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.35 vs. SSGSX (-1.13).
| HWSCX | SSGSX | HWSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.23 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.23 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.573 | 19.646 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 890M | 4.32B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.52 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.57 | 14.73 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.29 | 15.09 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.35 | -1.13 | -2,863% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.34 | 37.07 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement