Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs SSGSX
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$11.93
Change-$0.04 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets777.74M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.96B
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWVZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWVZX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.96B vs. HWVZX (778M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWVZX (0.89) vs SSGSX (0.49). HWVZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWVZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.78). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.87 vs. SSGSX (-13.94). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 25.69 vs. SSGSX (2.50).
| HWVZX | SSGSX | HWVZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.841 | -4.243 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 778M | 4.96B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.49 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.87 | -13.94 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.70 | -10.31 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.69 | 2.50 | 1,026% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement