Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs SSGSX
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$12.44
Change-$0.14 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets815.78M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.54
Change-$0.45 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWVZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWVZX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.44B vs. HWVZX (816M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWVZX (0.87) vs SSGSX (0.48). HWVZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWVZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.76). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.14 vs. SSGSX (-3.68). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 50.77 vs. SSGSX (20.58).
| HWVZX | SSGSX | HWVZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.110 | 1.206 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 816M | 5.44B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.48 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.14 | -3.68 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.70 | 7.50 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.77 | 20.58 | 247% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement