Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs SSGSX
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$11.59
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets753.52M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.37B
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWVZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWVZX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.37B vs. HWVZX (754M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWVZX (0.92) vs SSGSX (0.50). HWVZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWVZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.76). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.89 vs. SSGSX (-5.17). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 45.58 vs. SSGSX (14.10).
| HWVZX | SSGSX | HWVZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.682 | -4.932 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 754M | 5.37B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.50 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.89 | -5.17 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.82 | -7.99 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.58 | 14.10 | 323% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement