Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs SSGSX
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$12.59
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets817.8M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.93
Change-$0.05 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.58B
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWVZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWVZX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.58B vs. HWVZX (818M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWVZX (0.85) vs SSGSX (0.47). HWVZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWVZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.76). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.98 vs. SSGSX (-4.33). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 59.82 vs. SSGSX (27.16).
| HWVZX | SSGSX | HWVZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.435 | 1.185 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 818M | 5.58B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.47 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.98 | -4.33 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.25 | 3.52 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.82 | 27.16 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement