Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs WCMJX
HWVZX vs WCMJX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs WCMJX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$12.44
Change-$0.14 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets815.78M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Investor
Price$11.18
Change-$0.17 (-1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.69B
HWVZX vs WCMJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWVZX vs. WCMJX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWVZX is a Hold and WCMJX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMJX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. HWVZX (816M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than WCMJX: HWVZX (0.87) vs WCMJX (0.00). HWVZX was incepted earlier than WCMJX: HWVZX (6 years) vs WCMJX (6 years). WCMJX (1.70) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.76). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. WCMJX (15.00). WCMJX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: WCMJX (1000) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.14 vs. WCMJX (-17.15). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 50.77 vs. WCMJX (25.00).
| HWVZX | WCMJX | HWVZX / WCMJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.15 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.70 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.110 | -3.650 | -58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 816M | 23.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.14 | -17.15 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.70 | 20.74 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.77 | 25.00 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement