It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HY (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -14.18% price change this week, while MTW (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was +29.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +4.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.97%.
HY is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
MTW is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
HY | MTW | HY / MTW | |
Capitalization | 1.12B | 502M | 224% |
EBITDA | 263M | 138M | 191% |
Gain YTD | -12.114 | -32.894 | 37% |
P/E Ratio | 8.77 | 12.82 | 68% |
Revenue | 4.12B | 2.23B | 185% |
Total Cash | 78.8M | 34.4M | 229% |
Total Debt | 494M | 419M | 118% |
HY | MTW | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 13 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTW's Valuation (67) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as HY (90). This means that MTW’s stock grew similarly to HY’s over the last 12 months.
HY's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as MTW (100). This means that HY’s stock grew similarly to MTW’s over the last 12 months.
HY's SMR Rating (21) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTW (88). This means that HY’s stock grew significantly faster than MTW’s over the last 12 months.
MTW's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as HY (64). This means that MTW’s stock grew similarly to HY’s over the last 12 months.
MTW's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for HY (83). This means that MTW’s stock grew significantly faster than HY’s over the last 12 months.
HY | MTW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago70% | 1 day ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago76% | 9 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HY has been loosely correlated with MTW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HY jumps, then MTW could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTW has been closely correlated with OSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTW jumps, then OSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MTW | 100% | +1.45% | ||
OSK - MTW | 67% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
TEX - MTW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
CMCO - MTW | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
ASTE - MTW | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
ALG - MTW | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More |