HYDR
Price
$42.74
Change
-$1.89 (-4.23%)
Updated
Sep 28, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
95.69M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QCLN
Price
$47.76
Change
-$1.55 (-3.14%)
Updated
Sep 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
561.06M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYDR vs QCLN

HYDR vs QCLN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 11, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) vs. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN)

Key Takeaways

  • Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) provides concentrated exposure to the hydrogen industry through a passive strategy tracking the Solactive Global Hydrogen Index, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) offers broader clean energy exposure via the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index.
  • HYDR maintains a smaller portfolio of approximately 25 holdings focused on hydrogen production, fuel cells, and related technologies, resulting in higher concentration risk compared to QCLN's roughly 50 holdings spanning solar, wind, batteries, and electric vehicles.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.50% for HYDR and 0.59% for QCLN, reflecting modest cost differences that favor the former on an ongoing basis.
  • Both ETFs target thematic clean energy growth but differ in sector allocation: HYDR emphasizes hydrogen-specific companies, whereas QCLN captures a wider array of renewable and alternative energy subsectors.
  • Structural characteristics include passive indexing for both, with HYDR showing greater geographic diversification across developed and emerging markets in hydrogen-related firms.
  • Relative positioning highlights HYDR's narrower thematic focus versus QCLN's diversified clean energy approach, influencing volatility and sector rotation exposure in recent market cycles.

Introduction

Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) both provide investors access to clean energy themes but pursue distinct strategies within the sector. HYDR concentrates on hydrogen technology advancement, while QCLN delivers broader exposure to green energy solutions including renewables and storage. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative options for investors seeking thematic growth in decarbonization and energy transition. The comparison helps clarify structural differences, cost profiles, and positioning amid evolving policy support and technological progress in sustainable energy.

Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) Overview

Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) is a passive exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the Solactive Global Hydrogen Index. The index targets companies deriving significant revenue from hydrogen production, transportation, storage, fuel cells, electrolyzers, and related infrastructure. The fund holds approximately 25 securities with a tiered market-cap weighting methodology. Top holdings typically include Bloom Energy Corp (BE), Plug Power Inc (PLUG), and Ceres Power Holdings PLC, among other hydrogen specialists. Sector allocation centers on alternative energy equipment and components. The expense ratio is 0.50%. As a thematic equity ETF, it features full physical replication and periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment, with global exposure spanning developed and emerging markets.

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) Overview

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) is a passive ETF designed to replicate the performance of the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index. This benchmark includes U.S.-listed companies involved in manufacturing, development, distribution, and installation of clean energy technologies such as solar photovoltaics, wind power, advanced batteries, fuel cells, and electric vehicles. The fund typically holds around 50 securities using a modified market-capitalization approach. Prominent holdings often feature Monolithic Power Systems Inc (MPWR), Bloom Energy Corp (BE), Tesla Inc (TSLA), and First Solar Inc (FSLR). Sector breakdown spans semiconductors, renewable energy equipment, automobiles, and electrical components. The expense ratio stands at 0.59%. The structure emphasizes U.S.-focused clean energy equities with quarterly rebalancing.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The clean energy sector continues to benefit from long-term policy incentives, technological advancements in renewables and storage, and corporate commitments to net-zero targets. Hydrogen-specific developments include scaling electrolyzer production and infrastructure investments, while broader green energy faces capital allocation toward solar, wind, and battery supply chains. Macro drivers encompass interest rate trajectories, commodity price fluctuations, and supply chain resilience. Regulatory support such as tax credits and emissions standards provides tailwinds, though risks include policy shifts, high capital intensity, and competition from traditional energy sources. Both ETFs operate within this environment of accelerating energy transition amid variable macroeconomic conditions.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, HYDR has exhibited higher volatility due to its concentrated hydrogen focus and sensitivity to fuel cell technology adoption rates. QCLN has shown relatively broader diversification, leading to different responses to sector rotations involving electric vehicles and renewable generation. Performance differentials often tie to earnings trends among top holdings, commodity input costs, and shifts in investor preference between pure-play hydrogen and multi-technology clean energy baskets. HYDR's narrower mandate may amplify upside in hydrogen breakthroughs but increase drawdowns during sector-specific setbacks, while QCLN's wider scope supports more balanced exposure across clean energy subsectors.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener for tailored market insights.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic edge to Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, focused thematic alignment with emerging hydrogen infrastructure growth, and diversified geographic holdings. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) offers stronger diversification across multiple clean energy subsectors, which may suit investors prioritizing broader risk mitigation. The assessment rests on observable factors including cost efficiency, concentration profile, and sector momentum without constituting investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
HYDR vs. QCLN commentary
Sep 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYDR is a Hold and QCLN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYDRQCLN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
HYDR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QCLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SENEB184.203.97
+2.20%
Seneca Foods Corp
SRRK48.630.02
+0.04%
Scholar Rock Holding Corp
PIII7.05N/A
N/A
P3 Health Partners Inc
CB333.37-1.47
-0.44%
Chubb Limited
IIIV14.88-0.25
-1.65%
i3 Verticals

HYDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYDR has been closely correlated with BE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HYDR jumps, then BE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYDR
1D Price
Change %
HYDR100%
+3.07%
BE - HYDR
77%
Closely correlated
+8.27%
PLUG - HYDR
70%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
BLDP - HYDR
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
FCEL - HYDR
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
CMI - HYDR
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
More

QCLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLN has been closely correlated with BE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCLN jumps, then BE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QCLN
1D Price
Change %
QCLN100%
+2.22%
BE - QCLN
75%
Closely correlated
+8.27%
MPWR - QCLN
74%
Closely correlated
+2.39%
AEIS - QCLN
72%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
ALGM - QCLN
71%
Closely correlated
+4.64%
ENS - QCLN
71%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
More