HYHDF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
MAUSY
Price
$10.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HYHDF vs MAUSY

Header iconHYHDF vs MAUSY Comparison
Open Charts HYHDF vs MAUSYBanner chart's image
SIXTY SIX CAP
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$382
CapitalizationN/A
Matsui Securities
Price$10.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$178
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
HYHDF vs MAUSY Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
HYHDF vs. MAUSY commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYHDF is a Hold and MAUSY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (HYHDF: $0.03 vs. MAUSY: $10.90)
Brand notoriety: HYHDF and MAUSY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYHDF: 11% vs. MAUSY: 127%
Market capitalization -- HYHDF: $3.69M vs. MAUSY: $1.47B
HYHDF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.69M. MAUSY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYHDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAUSY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HYHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAUSY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HYHDF is a better buy in the long-term than MAUSY.

Price Growth

HYHDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -14.44% price change this week, while MAUSY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAUSY is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.30% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAUSY($1.47B) has a higher market cap than HYHDF($3.69M). MAUSY has higher P/E ratio than HYHDF: MAUSY (27.03) vs HYHDF (0.59). HYHDF YTD gains are higher at: 50.652 vs. MAUSY (2.315). HYHDF has less debt than MAUSY: HYHDF (6.6M) vs MAUSY (260B). MAUSY has higher revenues than HYHDF: MAUSY (28.5B) vs HYHDF (0).
HYHDFMAUSYHYHDF / MAUSY
Capitalization3.69M1.47B0%
EBITDA-22.02MN/A-
Gain YTD50.6522.3152,188%
P/E Ratio0.5927.032%
Revenue028.5B-
Total Cash6.21MN/A-
Total Debt6.6M260B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAUSY: Fundamental Ratings
MAUSY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
96
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
4
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

HYHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYHDF and PIHG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYHDF and PIHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYHDF
1D Price
Change %
HYHDF100%
N/A
PIHG - HYHDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPXGY - HYHDF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
LNSTY - HYHDF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
HKXCY - HYHDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
MAUSY - HYHDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MAUSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAUSY and SWIN have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAUSY and SWIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAUSY
1D Price
Change %
MAUSY100%
N/A
SWIN - MAUSY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
LNSTY - MAUSY
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
HKXCY - MAUSY
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
JPXGY - MAUSY
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
HYHDF - MAUSY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More