Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HYMAX vs NHCCX
HYMAX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts HYMAX vs NHCCX
Lord Abbett High Income Muni Bond A
Price$10.53
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.01B
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.11
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.65B
HYMAX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HYMAX vs. NHCCX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYMAX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. HYMAX (4.02B). HYMAX (4.83) and NHCCX (4.69) have matching dividends . HYMAX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: HYMAX (21 years) vs NHCCX (12 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than HYMAX (0.82). HYMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NHCCX (18.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HYMAX: NHCCX (200) vs HYMAX (1000). HYMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.55 vs. NHCCX (-4.07). HYMAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.15 vs. NHCCX (3.25).
| HYMAX | NHCCX | HYMAX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.80 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.80 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.705 | -1.714 | 41% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 200 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.02B | 12.7B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.83 | 4.69 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.55 | -4.07 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.72 | 5.12 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.15 | 3.25 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.21 | 16.02 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement