Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HYMAX vs NHCCX
HYMAX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts HYMAX vs NHCCX
HYMAX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HYMAX vs. NHCCX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYMAX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. HYMAX (4.56B). HYMAX (4.78) and NHCCX (4.59) have matching dividends . HYMAX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: HYMAX (22 years) vs NHCCX (12 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than HYMAX (0.84). HYMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NHCCX (18.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HYMAX: NHCCX (200) vs HYMAX (1000). NHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. HYMAX (8.00). HYMAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.97 vs. NHCCX (-2.44).
| HYMAX | NHCCX | HYMAX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.80 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.80 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.120 | 4.007 | 103% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 200 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.56B | 12.9B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.78 | 4.59 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | 8.70 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.26 | 11.56 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.97 | -2.44 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.81 | 16.46 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement