Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HYMAX vs NHCCX
HYMAX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts HYMAX vs NHCCX
HYMAX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HYMAX vs. NHCCX commentary
Aug 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYMAX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. HYMAX (4.55B). HYMAX (4.89) and NHCCX (4.72) have matching dividends . HYMAX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: HYMAX (22 years) vs NHCCX (13 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than HYMAX (0.84). HYMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NHCCX (15.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HYMAX: NHCCX (200) vs HYMAX (1000). NHCCX (7.62) and HYMAX (7.54) have marching annual gain over last year. HYMAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.30 vs. NHCCX (-5.05).
| HYMAX | NHCCX | HYMAX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.80 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.80 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.121 | 1.322 | 160% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 200 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.55B | 12.5B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.89 | 4.72 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 7.62 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.03 | 11.87 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.30 | -5.05 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.79 | 13.52 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers