Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HYMAX vs NHCCX
HYMAX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts HYMAX vs NHCCX
HYMAX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HYMAX vs. NHCCX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYMAX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. HYMAX (4.51B). HYMAX (4.89) and NHCCX (4.72) have matching dividends . HYMAX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: HYMAX (22 years) vs NHCCX (12 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than HYMAX (0.84). HYMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NHCCX (15.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HYMAX: NHCCX (200) vs HYMAX (1000). NHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.16 vs. HYMAX (7.22). HYMAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.87 vs. NHCCX (-5.31).
| HYMAX | NHCCX | HYMAX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.80 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.80 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.314 | 1.538 | 150% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 200 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.51B | 12.5B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.89 | 4.72 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.22 | 8.16 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.37 | 10.65 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.87 | -5.31 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.20 | 14.14 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement