HZNOF
Price
$6.84
Change
-$0.11 (-1.58%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
285.47M
INTO
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HZNOF vs INTO

Header iconHZNOF vs INTO Comparison
Open Charts HZNOF vs INTOBanner chart's image
DEXTERRA GROUP
Price$6.84
Change-$0.11 (-1.58%)
Volume$100
Capitalization285.47M
Initio
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$365
Capitalization2.18M
HZNOF vs INTO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HZNOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HZNOF vs. INTO commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HZNOF is a Hold and INTO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (HZNOF: $6.84 vs. INTO: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: HZNOF and INTO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HZNOF: 35% vs. INTO: 100%
Market capitalization -- HZNOF: $285.47M vs. INTO: $2.18M
HZNOF [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $285.47M. INTO’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $2.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HZNOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINTO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HZNOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • INTO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HZNOF is a better buy in the long-term than INTO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HZNOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HZNOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

HZNOF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -3.25% price change this week, while INTO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.96% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HZNOF($285M) has a higher market cap than INTO($2.18M). HZNOF YTD gains are higher at: 24.025 vs. INTO (-40.476). HZNOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 56M vs. INTO (236K). INTO has less debt than HZNOF: INTO (668K) vs HZNOF (138M). HZNOF has higher revenues than INTO: HZNOF (1.02B) vs INTO (209K).
HZNOFINTOHZNOF / INTO
Capitalization285M2.18M13,079%
EBITDA56M236K23,729%
Gain YTD24.025-40.476-59%
P/E Ratio52.63N/A-
Revenue1.02B209K486,124%
Total Cash0N/A-
Total Debt138M668K20,659%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HZNOF vs INTO: Fundamental Ratings
HZNOF
INTO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8733
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36100
SMR RATING
1..100
63100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4183
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HZNOF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as INTO (31). This means that HZNOF’s stock grew similarly to INTO’s over the last 12 months.

HZNOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTO (100). This means that HZNOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTO’s over the last 12 months.

HZNOF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTO (100). This means that HZNOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTO’s over the last 12 months.

HZNOF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTO (83). This means that HZNOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTO’s over the last 12 months.

HZNOF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTO (100). This means that HZNOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HZNOFINTO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HZNOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WINT1.050.15
+16.67%
Windtree Therapeutics Inc.
APAM46.770.39
+0.84%
Artisan Partners Asset Management
WILC19.950.03
+0.15%
G Willi-Food International Ltd
ASIX21.90N/A
N/A
AdvanSix
RCI33.11-0.55
-1.63%
Rogers Communications

HZNOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HZNOF and IKTSF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HZNOF and IKTSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HZNOF
1D Price
Change %
HZNOF100%
-1.58%
IKTSF - HZNOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IKTSY - HZNOF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
KMNCF - HZNOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INTO - HZNOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBRLF - HZNOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
More

INTO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INTO and BEDU have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INTO and BEDU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTO
1D Price
Change %
INTO100%
N/A
BEDU - INTO
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.00%
RKLIF - INTO
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.54%
IVDA - INTO
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
IKTSY - INTO
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
IKTSF - INTO
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More