Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBAT vs NLR
IBAT vs NLR Comparison
Open Charts IBAT vs NLR
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
Price$29.66
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
Volume$2.27K
Net Assets10.59M
VanEck Uranium & Nuclear ETF
Price$129.60
Change+$3.16 (+2.50%)
Volume$458.74K
Net Assets3.47B
IBAT vs NLR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBAT vs. NLR commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBAT is a Hold and NLR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLR has more net assets: 3.47B vs. IBAT (10.6M). NLR has a higher annual dividend yield than IBAT: NLR (59.331) vs IBAT (36.050). IBAT was incepted earlier than NLR: IBAT (2 years) vs NLR (18 years). IBAT (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than NLR (0.56). NLR has a higher turnover IBAT (23.00) vs IBAT (23.00).
| IBAT | NLR | IBAT / NLR | |
| Gain YTD | 36.050 | 59.331 | 61% |
| Net Assets | 10.6M | 3.47B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.56 | 84% |
| Turnover | 23.00 | 36.00 | 64% |
| Yield | 1.03 | 0.40 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IBAT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IBAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IBAT and BE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBAT and BE's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBAT | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| BE - IBAT | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.77% | ||
| QS - IBAT | 19% Poorly correlated | -3.93% | ||
| ETN - IBAT | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.18% | ||
| ENS - IBAT | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
| FCEL - IBAT | 13% Poorly correlated | -4.68% | ||
More | ||||
NLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLR has been closely correlated with SMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NLR jumps, then SMR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y