Intraday BUY SELL Signals
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBAT vs QS
IBAT vs QS Comparison
Open Charts IBAT vs QS
IBAT vs QS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBAT vs. QS commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBAT is a Hold and QS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QS: Fundamental Ratings
QS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IBAT | QS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 84% | 14 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 77% | 16 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IBAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBAT has been loosely correlated with BLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IBAT jumps, then BLDP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBAT | 100% | N/A | ||
| BLDP - IBAT | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| FCEL - IBAT | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| QS - IBAT | 45% Loosely correlated | +4.22% | ||
| ENPH - IBAT | 37% Loosely correlated | +4.35% | ||
| PLUG - IBAT | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.25% | ||
More | ||||
QS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with SLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then SLDP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y