Ad is loading...
IBUY vs PEJ
IBUY vs PEJ Comparison
Open Charts IBUY vs PEJ
Amplify Online Retail ETF
Price$63.75
Change-$0.11 (-0.17%)
Volume$122
Net Assets142.6M
Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entmnt ETF
Price$49.94
Change+$0.51 (+1.03%)
Volume$1.09K
Net Assets320.83M
IBUY vs PEJ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBUY vs. PEJ commentary
May 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBUY is a Buy and PEJ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEJ has more net assets: 321M vs. IBUY (143M). IBUY has a higher annual dividend yield than PEJ: IBUY (-1.214) vs PEJ (-5.263). IBUY was incepted earlier than PEJ: IBUY (9 years) vs PEJ (20 years). PEJ (0.57) has a lower expense ratio than IBUY (0.65). PEJ has a higher turnover IBUY (38.00) vs IBUY (38.00).
| IBUY | PEJ | IBUY / PEJ | |
| Gain YTD | -1.214 | -5.263 | 23% |
| Net Assets | 143M | 321M | 45% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.57 | 114% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 163.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IBUY | PEJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 85% | 8 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IBUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBUY has been closely correlated with W. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBUY jumps, then W could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBUY | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| W - IBUY | 73% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| AFRM - IBUY | 71% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| CVNA - IBUY | 67% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| BKNG - IBUY | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| ABNB - IBUY | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
More | ||||
PEJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEJ has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PEJ jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y