Advertisement
ICE vs MSCI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICE is a Hold and MSCI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ICE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMSCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ICE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MSCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ICE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSCI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ICE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MSCI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
ICE (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -0.26% price change this week, while MSCI (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -3.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
ICE is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
MSCI is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Publishing/Services (-2.32% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| ICE | MSCI | ICE / MSCI | |
| Capitalization | 87.6B | 42B | 209% |
| EBITDA | 6.56B | 1.88B | 350% |
| Gain YTD | 3.972 | -5.553 | -72% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.99 | 35.48 | 79% |
| Revenue | 12.5B | 3.06B | 409% |
| Total Cash | 2.2B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 19.5B | 5.62B | 347% |
ICE | MSCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MSCI's Valuation (11) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICE (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICE’s over the last 12 months.
ICE's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MSCI (52) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to MSCI’s over the last 12 months.
MSCI's SMR Rating (8) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICE (64) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICE’s over the last 12 months.
MSCI's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (61) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.
MSCI's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (74) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.
| ICE | MSCI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 14 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 67% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FNGG | 237.92 | 2.59 | +1.10% |
| Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | |||
| STBF | 25.41 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Performance Trust Short Term | |||
| PSCD | 97.26 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discret ETF | |||
| IDHQ | 33.71 | -0.16 | -0.47% |
| Invesco S&P International Dev Qual ETF | |||
| SHLD | 62.96 | -1.23 | -1.92% |
| Global X Defense Tech ETF | |||
MSCI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSCI has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSCI jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSCI | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| MCO - MSCI | 67% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| MORN - MSCI | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| SPGI - MSCI | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| NDAQ - MSCI | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| JEF - MSCI | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.87% | ||
More | ||||