Advertisement
ICL vs JHID
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICL is a Hold and JHID is a Hold.
ICL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 5 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ICL | JHID | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 51% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ICL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while .
- ICL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ICL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ICL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ICL (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -1.95% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -11.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -24.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
ICL is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Agricultural (-11.65% weekly)The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GLXU | 4.96 | 0.04 | +0.81% |
| T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF (GLXU) | |||
| QCOC | 24.59 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - October (QCOC) | |||
| AOK | 40.32 | -0.06 | -0.15% |
| iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) | |||
| IGIB | 50.15 | -0.10 | -0.20% |
| iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) | |||
| FAAR | 32.15 | -0.21 | -0.66% |
| First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) | |||
ICL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICL has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICL jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICL | 100% | +1.41% | ||
| MOS - ICL | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.23% | ||
| IPI - ICL | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| CTVA - ICL | 25% Poorly correlated | -5.17% | ||
| BIOX - ICL | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.15% | ||
| NTR - ICL | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||
JHID and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JHID has been loosely correlated with WFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JHID jumps, then WFG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JHID | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JHID | 100% | N/A | ||
| WFG - JHID | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| BP - JHID | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| MC - JHID | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| ICL - JHID | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| BLND - JHID | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
More | ||||