ICOP
Price
$57.31
Change
-$0.57 (-0.98%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
498.82M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHO
Price
$70.55
Change
-$0.29 (-0.41%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
1.99B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICOP vs PHO

ICOP vs PHO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) vs. Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO)

Key Takeaways

  • ICOP provides targeted exposure to global copper and metals mining companies through a passive strategy tracking the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, with approximately 45 holdings concentrated in the materials sector.
  • PHO offers exposure to U.S. companies involved in water conservation and purification via the NASDAQ OMX U.S. Water Index, emphasizing industrials and utilities with a broader thematic focus on water resources.
  • Structural differences include ICOP's lower expense ratio of 0.47% compared to PHO's 0.59%, along with ICOP's international diversification versus PHO's U.S.-centric holdings.
  • Both ETFs follow passive, rules-based methodologies with periodic rebalancing, positioning them as thematic vehicles rather than broad market or leveraged products.
  • Risk profiles diverge with ICOP tied to commodity price cycles and mining operations, while PHO aligns with infrastructure spending and regulatory developments in water management.
  • Cost efficiency and sector-specific momentum favor relative positioning considerations for investors seeking either metals mining or water infrastructure exposure.

Introduction

Investors evaluating thematic exchange-traded funds (ETFs) often compare products that address distinct yet complementary aspects of resource demand. The iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and the Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) do not compete directly but represent alternative strategies targeting natural resource themes. ICOP focuses on copper and metals mining equities globally, while PHO emphasizes U.S. companies supporting water conservation and purification. This comparison highlights structural differences, exposure profiles, and positioning within the current market environment of evolving commodity trends and infrastructure priorities.

iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) Overview

The iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) is a passively managed ETF launched in 2023 that seeks to track the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index (Net). It holds approximately 45 equities primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining, with nearly 100% allocation to the materials sector. Top holdings typically include BHP Group Ltd, Anglo American PLC, Grupo Mexico B, Freeport-McMoRan Inc, and Teck Resources, reflecting a market-capitalization-weighted approach with geographic diversification across Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States. The fund maintains an expense ratio of 0.47% and follows a physical replication strategy without leverage or inverse features. Its distinguishing characteristic is concentrated thematic exposure to copper demand drivers through a rules-based index methodology.

Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) Overview

The Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) is a passively managed ETF launched in 2005 that tracks the NASDAQ OMX U.S. Water Index. It provides exposure to U.S. exchange-listed companies that develop products for water conservation and purification, with a portfolio of roughly 30-40 holdings. Sector allocations emphasize industrials, followed by utilities and information technology. Representative holdings often feature companies such as Waters Corp, Ferguson Enterprises Inc, and Ecolab Inc. The ETF applies a liquidity-weighted methodology with annual reconstitution and quarterly rebalancing, maintaining an expense ratio of 0.59%. As a non-diversified fund, it delivers targeted U.S.-focused thematic exposure without derivatives or leveraged structures.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader natural resources and infrastructure themes. Copper mining exposure in ICOP aligns with global electrification, renewable energy deployment, and supply chain considerations. Water resources exposure in PHO connects to infrastructure modernization, regulatory standards for water quality, and population-driven demand. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate environments, industrial production trends, and sustainability initiatives influence capital flows into these sectors. Regulatory developments around mining permits and water management standards represent ongoing considerations, while commodity price volatility and capital expenditure cycles shape the environment for both strategies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, ICOP has demonstrated sensitivity to copper price movements and mining sector rotations driven by global industrial demand. PHO has shown steadier behavior linked to steady infrastructure spending and water utility earnings patterns. Relative positioning reflects differing volatility profiles, with ICOP exhibiting higher commodity beta and PHO displaying characteristics more aligned with defensive industrials. Earnings cycles of top holdings, interest rate expectations, and shifts in capital allocation between metals and water infrastructure have influenced performance differentials over recent weeks and months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on ETFs like ICOP and PHO may find the platform useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, diversified global holdings, and alignment with copper demand trends, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference to the iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) over the Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Structural cost efficiency and thematic momentum in metals mining contribute to this assessment, though individual investor objectives and risk tolerance should guide final decisions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ICOP vs. PHO commentary
Sep 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICOP is a Hold and PHO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHO has more net assets: 1.99B vs. ICOP (499M). ICOP has a higher annual dividend yield than PHO: ICOP (29.989) vs PHO (0.542). ICOP was incepted earlier than PHO: ICOP (3 years) vs PHO (21 years). ICOP (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than PHO (0.59). PHO has a higher turnover ICOP (24.00) vs ICOP (24.00).
ICOPPHOICOP / PHO
Gain YTD29.9890.5425,530%
Net Assets499M1.99B25%
Total Expense Ratio0.470.5980%
Turnover24.0034.0071%
Yield1.540.57271%
Fund Existence3 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICOPPHO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICOP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSYGX97.090.59
+0.61%
Putnam Small Cap Growth Y
CLGRX83.48-0.04
-0.05%
Calvert US Large Cap Growth Rspnb Idx R6
SGZFX68.74-0.06
-0.09%
Saturna Growth Z
COFYX45.15-0.16
-0.35%
Columbia Contrarian Core Inst3
PHRIX20.41-0.13
-0.63%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Secs I

ICOP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICOP
1D Price
Change %
ICOP100%
-0.98%
RIO - ICOP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
MTAL - ICOP
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AAL - ICOP
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
TKO - ICOP
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
BHP - ICOP
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More

PHO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHO has been closely correlated with XYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHO jumps, then XYL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHO
1D Price
Change %
PHO100%
-0.41%
XYL - PHO
70%
Closely correlated
-2.04%
MWA - PHO
69%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
FERG - PHO
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
FELE - PHO
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
GRC - PHO
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More