Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICSFX vs RMEBX
ICSFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ICSFX vs RMEBX
ICSFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICSFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICSFX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. ICSFX (14.8B). ICSFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: ICSFX (1.74) vs RMEBX (1.04). ICSFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ICSFX (14 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than ICSFX (0.44). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ICSFX (26.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICSFX: RMEBX (250) vs ICSFX (1000000). ICSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.69 vs. RMEBX (9.16). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.79 vs. ICSFX (23.42).
| ICSFX | RMEBX | ICSFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.07 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.07 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.459 | 6.885 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 117B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.04 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.69 | 9.16 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.64 | 33.97 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.42 | 33.79 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.34 | 92.81 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement