Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICSFX vs RMEBX
ICSFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ICSFX vs RMEBX
ICSFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICSFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICSFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ICSFX (14.9B). ICSFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: ICSFX (1.74) vs RMEBX (1.00). ICSFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ICSFX (14 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than ICSFX (0.44). ICSFX (31.00) and RMEBX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICSFX: RMEBX (250) vs ICSFX (1000000). ICSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.18 vs. RMEBX (8.73). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.28 vs. ICSFX (28.19).
| ICSFX | RMEBX | ICSFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.07 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.07 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.481 | 9.059 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.9B | 118B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.00 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.18 | 8.73 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.14 | 34.30 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.19 | 36.28 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.54 | 89.36 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement