Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICSFX vs RMFCX
ICSFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ICSFX vs RMFCX
ICSFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICSFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICSFX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. ICSFX (14.8B). ICSFX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: ICSFX (1.74) vs RMFCX (1.19). ICSFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ICSFX (14 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ICSFX (0.44). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ICSFX (26.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICSFX: RMFCX (250) vs ICSFX (1000000). ICSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.69 vs. RMFCX (9.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.71 vs. ICSFX (23.42).
| ICSFX | RMFCX | ICSFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.459 | 6.953 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 117B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.19 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.69 | 9.31 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.64 | 34.52 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.42 | 34.71 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.34 | 94.50 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement