IDCBF
Price
$0.75
Change
-$0.04 (-5.06%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
344.3B
INGVF
Price
$23.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
70.66B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDCBF vs INGVF

Header iconIDCBF vs INGVF Comparison
Open Charts IDCBF vs INGVFBanner chart's image
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Price$0.75
Change-$0.04 (-5.06%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization344.3B
ING Groep
Price$23.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$767
Capitalization70.66B
IDCBF vs INGVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDCBF vs. INGVF commentary
Aug 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCBF is a Hold and INGVF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 31, 2025
Stock price -- (IDCBF: $0.75 vs. INGVF: $23.90)
Brand notoriety: IDCBF and INGVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDCBF: 25% vs. INGVF: 139%
Market capitalization -- IDCBF: $344.3B vs. INGVF: $70.66B
IDCBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $344.3B. INGVF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $70.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $828.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDCBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINGVF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IDCBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • INGVF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, INGVF is a better buy in the long-term than IDCBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDCBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INGVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IDCBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • INGVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INGVF is a better buy in the short-term than IDCBF.

Price Growth

IDCBF (@Major Banks) experienced а -6.54% price change this week, while INGVF (@Major Banks) price change was +0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +129.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.79% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDCBF($344B) has a higher market cap than INGVF($70.7B). INGVF has higher P/E ratio than IDCBF: INGVF (10.31) vs IDCBF (5.53). INGVF YTD gains are higher at: 57.243 vs. IDCBF (20.115). INGVF has less debt than IDCBF: INGVF (168B) vs IDCBF (3.04T). IDCBF has higher revenues than INGVF: IDCBF (810B) vs INGVF (22.6B).
IDCBFINGVFIDCBF / INGVF
Capitalization344B70.7B487%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.11557.24335%
P/E Ratio5.5310.3154%
Revenue810B22.6B3,584%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.04T168B1,811%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDCBF vs INGVF: Fundamental Ratings
IDCBF
INGVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8333
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6521
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2321
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IDCBF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as INGVF (75). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to INGVF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDCBF (65). This means that INGVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as INGVF (4). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to INGVF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBF (56). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBF (23). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDCBFINGVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OKYO2.350.07
+3.30%
OKYO Pharma Limited
YMM13.050.30
+2.35%
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd
VNET8.660.13
+1.52%
VNET Group
FRPH25.70-0.13
-0.50%
FRP Holdings
APVO1.64-0.06
-3.53%
Aptevo Therapeutics Inc

IDCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDCBF and BCS have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDCBF and BCS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCBF
1D Price
Change %
IDCBF100%
N/A
BCS - IDCBF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
SMFG - IDCBF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
INGVF - IDCBF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MUFG - IDCBF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
NAUBF - IDCBF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

INGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INGVF and RY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INGVF and RY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INGVF
1D Price
Change %
INGVF100%
N/A
RY - INGVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
ANZGF - INGVF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ING - INGVF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
BNS - INGVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
BMO - INGVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
More