IDCBF
Price
$0.72
Change
-$0.04 (-5.19%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
338.87B
INGVF
Price
$24.70
Change
-$0.80 (-3.14%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
72.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDCBF vs INGVF

Header iconIDCBF vs INGVF Comparison
Open Charts IDCBF vs INGVFBanner chart's image
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Price$0.72
Change-$0.04 (-5.19%)
Volume$7.28K
Capitalization338.87B
ING Groep
Price$24.70
Change-$0.80 (-3.14%)
Volume$100
Capitalization72.04B
IDCBF vs INGVF Comparison Chart in %
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDCBF vs. INGVF commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCBF is a StrongBuy and INGVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (IDCBF: $0.71 vs. INGVF: $24.70)
Brand notoriety: IDCBF and INGVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDCBF: 3% vs. INGVF: 8%
Market capitalization -- IDCBF: $338.87B vs. INGVF: $72.04B
IDCBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $338.87B. INGVF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $72.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $836.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $132.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDCBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINGVF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IDCBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • INGVF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, INGVF is a better buy in the long-term than IDCBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDCBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INGVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IDCBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • INGVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INGVF is a better buy in the short-term than IDCBF.

Price Growth

IDCBF (@Major Banks) experienced а -3.59% price change this week, while INGVF (@Major Banks) price change was -5.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.63% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDCBF($339B) has a higher market cap than INGVF($72B). INGVF has higher P/E ratio than IDCBF: INGVF (10.60) vs IDCBF (5.21). INGVF YTD gains are higher at: 62.500 vs. IDCBF (13.709). INGVF has less debt than IDCBF: INGVF (168B) vs IDCBF (3.19T). IDCBF has higher revenues than INGVF: IDCBF (823B) vs INGVF (22.6B).
IDCBFINGVFIDCBF / INGVF
Capitalization339B72B471%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.70962.50022%
P/E Ratio5.2110.6049%
Revenue823B22.6B3,642%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.19T168B1,898%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDCBF vs INGVF: Fundamental Ratings
IDCBF
INGVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8698
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6421
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2518
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INGVF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBF (67). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDCBF (64). This means that INGVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as INGVF (4). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to INGVF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBF (56). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBF (25). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDCBFINGVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEAM5.220.62
+13.48%
5E Advanced Materials Inc.
AGIO42.601.73
+4.23%
Agios Pharmaceuticals
CVLG22.040.82
+3.86%
Covenant Logistics Group Inc
SPRC4.380.05
+1.15%
SciSparc Ltd
ICLR186.48-0.17
-0.09%
ICON plc

IDCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDCBF and BCS have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDCBF and BCS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCBF
1D Price
Change %
IDCBF100%
-2.07%
BCS - IDCBF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
SMFG - IDCBF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
INGVF - IDCBF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MUFG - IDCBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
NAUBF - IDCBF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

INGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INGVF and RY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INGVF and RY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INGVF
1D Price
Change %
INGVF100%
N/A
RY - INGVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
ANZGF - INGVF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ING - INGVF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
BNS - INGVF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
BMO - INGVF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
More