IDCBF
Price
$0.75
Change
-$0.04 (-5.06%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
344.3B
NAUBF
Price
$26.69
Change
+$0.10 (+0.38%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
85.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDCBF vs NAUBF

Header iconIDCBF vs NAUBF Comparison
Open Charts IDCBF vs NAUBFBanner chart's image
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Price$0.75
Change-$0.04 (-5.06%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization344.3B
National Australia Bank Ltd. (Victoria, Australia)
Price$26.69
Change+$0.10 (+0.38%)
Volume$164
Capitalization85.11B
IDCBF vs NAUBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDCBF vs. NAUBF commentary
Aug 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCBF is a Hold and NAUBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 31, 2025
Stock price -- (IDCBF: $0.75 vs. NAUBF: $26.69)
Brand notoriety: IDCBF and NAUBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDCBF: 25% vs. NAUBF: 19%
Market capitalization -- IDCBF: $344.3B vs. NAUBF: $85.11B
IDCBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $344.3B. NAUBF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $85.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $828.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDCBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNAUBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IDCBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NAUBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NAUBF is a better buy in the long-term than IDCBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDCBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAUBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IDCBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • NAUBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAUBF is a better buy in the short-term than IDCBF.

Price Growth

IDCBF (@Major Banks) experienced а -6.54% price change this week, while NAUBF (@Major Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +129.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.79% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDCBF($344B) has a higher market cap than NAUBF($85.1B). NAUBF has higher P/E ratio than IDCBF: NAUBF (18.32) vs IDCBF (5.53). IDCBF YTD gains are higher at: 20.115 vs. NAUBF (15.943). NAUBF has less debt than IDCBF: NAUBF (212B) vs IDCBF (3.04T). IDCBF has higher revenues than NAUBF: IDCBF (810B) vs NAUBF (20.7B).
IDCBFNAUBFIDCBF / NAUBF
Capitalization344B85.1B404%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.11515.943126%
P/E Ratio5.5318.3230%
Revenue810B20.7B3,913%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.04T212B1,435%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDCBF vs NAUBF: Fundamental Ratings
IDCBF
NAUBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8348
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6527
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2351
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IDCBF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (77). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

NAUBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDCBF (65). This means that NAUBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (4). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

NAUBF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBF (56). This means that NAUBF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (51). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDCBFNAUBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBNB2.690.17
+6.75%
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.
TSN56.781.16
+2.09%
Tyson Foods
CLVT4.350.04
+0.93%
Clarivate Plc
NEOV3.590.02
+0.56%
NeoVolta
ATER0.97-0.04
-4.28%
Aterian

IDCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDCBF and BCS have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDCBF and BCS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCBF
1D Price
Change %
IDCBF100%
N/A
BCS - IDCBF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
SMFG - IDCBF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
INGVF - IDCBF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MUFG - IDCBF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
NAUBF - IDCBF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NAUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUBF and FANDF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUBF and FANDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUBF
1D Price
Change %
NAUBF100%
N/A
FANDF - NAUBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBFJF - NAUBF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCBFF - NAUBF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
IDCBY - NAUBF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
INGVF - NAUBF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More