IDCBF
Price
$0.74
Change
-$0.02 (-2.63%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
223.08B
NAUBF
Price
$24.73
Change
+$0.16 (+0.65%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
59.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDCBF vs NAUBF

Header iconIDCBF vs NAUBF Comparison
Open Charts IDCBF vs NAUBFBanner chart's image
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Price$0.74
Change-$0.02 (-2.63%)
Volume$9.33K
Capitalization223.08B
National Australia Bank Ltd. (Victoria, Australia)
Price$24.73
Change+$0.16 (+0.65%)
Volume$207
Capitalization59.59B
IDCBF vs NAUBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDCBF vs. NAUBF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCBF is a Hold and NAUBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (IDCBF: $0.74 vs. NAUBF: $24.74)
Brand notoriety: IDCBF and NAUBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDCBF: 104% vs. NAUBF: 22%
Market capitalization -- IDCBF: $223.08B vs. NAUBF: $59.59B
IDCBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $223.08B. NAUBF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $59.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDCBF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNAUBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IDCBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NAUBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IDCBF is a better buy in the long-term than NAUBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDCBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAUBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IDCBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NAUBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAUBF is a better buy in the short-term than IDCBF.

Price Growth

IDCBF (@Major Banks) experienced а -4.55% price change this week, while NAUBF (@Major Banks) price change was +0.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.69% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDCBF($223B) has a higher market cap than NAUBF($59.6B). NAUBF has higher P/E ratio than IDCBF: NAUBF (12.52) vs IDCBF (3.49). IDCBF YTD gains are higher at: 19.234 vs. NAUBF (7.450). NAUBF has less debt than IDCBF: NAUBF (139B) vs IDCBF (1.65T). IDCBF has higher revenues than NAUBF: IDCBF (911B) vs NAUBF (19.9B).
IDCBFNAUBFIDCBF / NAUBF
Capitalization223B59.6B374%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.2347.450258%
P/E Ratio3.4912.5228%
Revenue911B19.9B4,578%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.65T139B1,184%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDCBF vs NAUBF: Fundamental Ratings
IDCBF
NAUBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9098
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7531
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1864
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IDCBF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NAUBF (92). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew significantly faster than NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

NAUBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDCBF (75). This means that NAUBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (4). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (50). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAUBF (64). This means that IDCBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDCBFNAUBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CION10.330.46
+4.66%
CION Investment Corp
ALB70.062.76
+4.10%
Albemarle Corp
CTM1.220.02
+1.67%
Castellum
INSW43.08-0.62
-1.42%
International Seaways
SOBR3.22-0.35
-9.80%
Sobr Safe Inc

IDCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDCBF and BCS have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDCBF and BCS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCBF
1D Price
Change %
IDCBF100%
N/A
BCS - IDCBF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
SMFG - IDCBF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
INGVF - IDCBF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MUFG - IDCBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
NAUBF - IDCBF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NAUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUBF and FANDF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUBF and FANDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUBF
1D Price
Change %
NAUBF100%
N/A
FANDF - NAUBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBFJF - NAUBF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCBFF - NAUBF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
IDCBY - NAUBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
INGVF - NAUBF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More