IDCC vs LBTYA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCC is a Hold and LBTYA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IDCC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLBTYA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IDCC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- LBTYA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IDCC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBTYA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IDCC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LBTYA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
IDCC (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while LBTYA (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -3.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.20%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +85.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
IDCC is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
LBTYA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Wireless Telecommunications (-0.51% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| IDCC | LBTYA | IDCC / LBTYA | |
| Capitalization | 2.48B | 6.41B | 39% |
| EBITDA | 357M | -501.1M | -71% |
| Gain YTD | 83.031 | 36.006 | 231% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.78 | 14.39 | 89% |
| Revenue | 550M | 7.49B | 7% |
| Total Cash | 1.01B | 3.41B | 30% |
| Total Debt | 625M | 17.4B | 4% |
IDCC | LBTYA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 26 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IDCC's Valuation (49) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as LBTYA (62) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew similarly to LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBTYA (84) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew significantly faster than LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's SMR Rating (23) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBTYA (94) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew significantly faster than LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as LBTYA (40) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew similarly to LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.
LBTYA's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as IDCC (18) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that LBTYA’s stock grew similarly to IDCC’s over the last 12 months.
| IDCC | LBTYA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 60% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFND | 43.99 | 0.64 | +1.48% |
| Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | |||
| BUFB | 32.68 | -0.07 | -0.21% |
| Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF | |||
| ACWX | 53.42 | -0.21 | -0.40% |
| iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF | |||
| MLPR | 59.50 | -0.74 | -1.23% |
| ETRACS Qrtly Py 1.5X Lvgd Aln MLP ETN | |||
| REM | 21.88 | -1.26 | -5.45% |
| iShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF | |||
IDCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDCC has been loosely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IDCC jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IDCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDCC | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| ACIW - IDCC | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| OLO - IDCC | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| QTWO - IDCC | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| PEGA - IDCC | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| CWAN - IDCC | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
More | ||||
LBTYA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBTYA has been closely correlated with LBTYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBTYA jumps, then LBTYK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBTYA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBTYA | 100% | -2.51% | ||
| LBTYK - LBTYA | 100% Closely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| LBTYB - LBTYA | 81% Closely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| IDCC - LBTYA | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| KT - LBTYA | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| S - LBTYA | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
More | ||||