Advertisement
ACIW vs IDCC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) vs. InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ACIW demonstrates steadier recent market positioning with a lower beta of 1.03 compared to IDCC's 1.65, indicating reduced volatility.
- IDCC delivered strong Q1 2026 earnings, beating estimates on EPS and revenue, though shares experienced a sharp post-earnings decline.
- Both stocks show positive YTD returns around 8%, with IDCC's one-year gain at 46% outpacing ACIW's 18% amid broader tech momentum.
- ACIW's recent platform expansions and partnerships bolster fintech growth, while IDCC advances in AI and video tech licensing.
- Tickeron's comparison tool rates ACIW as a stronger short-term buy relative to IDCC.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines ACIW and IDCC, two Nasdaq-listed companies in distinct tech niches: payments software versus wireless and AI innovation. Traders seeking short-term momentum or investors eyeing relative stability in fintech and patent-driven growth may find value here. With both showing resilience in recent market activity amid economic shifts, understanding their business models, performance trends, and sentiment drivers provides clarity on potential trade-offs. This analysis draws from verifiable data to highlight contrasts in momentum, risk, and positioning as of recent weeks.
ACIW Overview and Recent Performance
ACIW, or ACI Worldwide, Inc., specializes in real-time electronic payment and banking solutions, serving global financial institutions. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $43–$44 per share, with a market cap near $4.4 billion. YTD performance stands at about 8.8%, supported by platform expansions like extending ACI Connetic to eight U.S. payment networks and a collaboration with Kinexys by J.P. Morgan to combat real-time payments fraud. These developments have influenced positive sentiment, alongside analyst buy ratings and a price target averaging $64. Quarterly revenue growth of 6.3% year-over-year underscores steady demand, though earnings growth dipped recently. Lower beta (1.03) reflects relative stability versus broader indices.
IDCC Overview and Recent Performance
IDCC, or InterDigital, Inc., focuses on R&D in wireless communications, video, and AI technologies, generating revenue primarily through patent licensing. Shares recently hovered near $292, with a market cap around $7.5–$9 billion following volatility. YTD return is approximately 8%, but one-year gains reached 46%, driven by tech sector tailwinds. Q1 2026 results beat expectations with EPS of $2.57 (versus $2.54 estimated) and revenue of $205 million, yet the stock dropped sharply post-release. Innovations in AI-enabled video and HDR streaming have boosted visibility. Higher beta (1.65) signals greater sensitivity to market swings, with a modest dividend yield of 0.74% adding appeal for income seekers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. These curated bots adapt to current market conditions, featuring annualized returns ranging from 24% to 164%, win rates of 51%–88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots with 60%–88% win rates on tickers like NVDA and AMD, and space tech bots achieving 127% returns. Short-term (1D) scalpers contrast with swing traders holding 50 days. Traders can explore these for automated insights without manual analysis, potentially enhancing strategies in volatile environments.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ACIW’s fintech model emphasizes recurring software revenue from payments infrastructure, contrasting IDCC’s lumpy patent licensing in wireless and AI. Growth drivers differ: ACIW benefits from multi-rail payment adoption and fraud prevention demand, while IDCC leverages 5G/6G royalties and video tech. Recent momentum favors IDCC’s superior one-year return, but ACIW shows tighter trend consistency with lower P/E (20x versus 25x–30x) and stability. Risk factors include ACIW’s no-dividend profile versus IDCC’s yield, but ACIW’s lower beta mitigates sector exposure risks. Market sentiment tilts toward ACIW for short-term positioning amid IDCC’s earnings volatility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors ACIW over IDCC, citing superior short-term trend strength, lower volatility, and ongoing fintech catalysts like platform expansions. While IDCC’s earnings beat and tech exposure offer upside potential, its higher beta and recent price swings suggest elevated near-term risks. This probabilistic edge aligns with observable stability and relative performance metrics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACIW is a StrongBuy and IDCC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACIW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIDCC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- ACIW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- IDCC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACIW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IDCC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACIW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- IDCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ACIW (@Computer Communications) experienced а -0.75% price change this week, while IDCC (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.26%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACIW is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
IDCC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-2.46% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-3.44% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ACIW | IDCC | ACIW / IDCC | |
| Capitalization | 4.59B | 7.22B | 64% |
| EBITDA | 449M | 535M | 84% |
| Gain YTD | -10.249 | -11.924 | 86% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.68 | 28.39 | 76% |
| Revenue | 1.79B | 829M | 216% |
| Total Cash | 162M | 1.08B | 15% |
| Total Debt | 837M | 402M | 208% |
ACIW | IDCC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IDCC's Valuation (16) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ACIW (29) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew similarly to ACIW’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACIW (89) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACIW’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's SMR Rating (27) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACIW (61) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACIW’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ACIW (53) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew similarly to ACIW’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ACIW (33) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew similarly to ACIW’s over the last 12 months.
| ACIW | IDCC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 7 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ESIM | 30.29 | 0.28 | +0.93% |
| Eventide International ETF | |||
| FNDE | 41.26 | 0.32 | +0.78% |
| Schwab Fundamental Emerging MarketsEqETF | |||
| SPMV | 50.75 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF | |||
| IBID | 26.24 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term Tips ETF | |||
| SSUS | 55.22 | -0.17 | -0.31% |
| Day Hagan Smart Sector ETF | |||
ACIW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACIW has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACIW jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACIW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACIW | 100% | -2.68% | ||
| QTWO - ACIW | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| HUBS - ACIW | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| BOX - ACIW | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| ROP - ACIW | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| EEFT - ACIW | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.20% | ||
More | ||||