IDHQ
Price
$42.99
Change
-$0.46 (-1.06%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Net Assets
919.81M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IQDG
Price
$42.81
Change
-$0.36 (-0.83%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Net Assets
704.19M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDHQ vs IQDG

IDHQ vs IQDG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) vs. WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG)

Key Takeaways

  • IDHQ and IQDG both target developed international equities with a quality orientation but differ in their core strategies: IDHQ emphasizes high-quality scores based on return on equity, accruals, and leverage, while IQDG focuses on dividend-paying companies exhibiting growth characteristics.
  • IDHQ offers a lower expense ratio of 0.29% compared to IQDG’s 0.42%, providing a cost advantage for long-term investors seeking similar developed-market exposure outside the United States and Canada.
  • IDHQ tracks the S&P Quality Developed ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index with semi-annual rebalancing and typically features broader sector diversification, including higher allocations to technology and healthcare.
  • IQDG employs a rules-based approach selecting dividend growers, resulting in notable exposure to consumer discretionary and industrials, with a higher distribution yield profile.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed, fully transparent equity vehicles without leverage or inverse features, appealing to investors seeking diversified international quality exposure rather than thematic or active strategies.
  • Relative positioning favors IDHQ for cost efficiency and quality purity, while IQDG may suit income-oriented investors prioritizing dividend growth within developed markets.

Introduction

Investors evaluating international equity allocations often compare quality-focused exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for their potential to deliver resilient returns amid global economic shifts. IDHQ and IQDG represent two distinct yet overlapping approaches to developed markets outside the United States and Canada. IDHQ prioritizes fundamental quality metrics across large- and mid-cap stocks, whereas IQDG screens for companies combining dividend payments with growth attributes. These ETFs do not compete directly in identical mandates but offer alternative pathways to similar investor goals of diversification and quality exposure within international equities.

Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) Overview

IDHQ seeks to track the S&P Quality Developed ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index, which selects constituents from the broader S&P Developed ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index based on the highest quality scores derived from return on equity, accruals ratio, and financial leverage ratio. The fund is passively managed and holds approximately 200-300 securities, with semi-annual rebalancing and reconstitution. Key sector allocations typically include industrials, technology, and healthcare as leading weights. The expense ratio stands at 0.29%. IDHQ distinguishes itself through its strict quality-factor methodology and broad developed-market coverage excluding the United States.

WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) Overview

IQDG tracks an index of dividend-paying companies in developed markets outside the United States and Canada that demonstrate growth characteristics. The fund is passively managed with a rules-based selection process emphasizing both dividend sustainability and earnings growth potential. It typically holds around 200 securities, with notable top positions in consumer discretionary and industrials names. Sector breakdowns often highlight industrials, consumer discretionary, and financials. The expense ratio is 0.42%. IQDG differentiates itself by integrating dividend growth criteria, appealing to investors balancing income and capital appreciation in international developed equities.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Developed international equities continue to attract attention as investors seek diversification beyond U.S. market dominance. Macroeconomic drivers include varying interest rate paths across regions, corporate earnings resilience in export-oriented sectors, and ongoing corporate governance improvements in markets such as Japan and Europe. Capital flows into quality and dividend-growth strategies reflect a preference for defensive characteristics amid geopolitical uncertainties and global supply-chain adjustments. Risks include currency fluctuations, regulatory shifts in key jurisdictions, and sector-specific challenges in energy and materials. Both ETFs operate within this environment, benefiting from broad developed-market momentum while navigating valuation differentials relative to U.S. counterparts.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, quality-oriented international strategies have shown resilience during periods of economic uncertainty, with IDHQ’s emphasis on balance-sheet strength and profitability metrics supporting relative stability. IQDG’s dividend-growth focus has aligned with sectors demonstrating consistent cash-flow generation, contributing to competitive positioning during earnings seasons. Both ETFs have participated in broader developed-market rotations driven by interest-rate expectations and global growth differentials. IDHQ generally exhibits lower cost drag, potentially enhancing net returns over extended horizons, while IQDG’s yield component provides an income buffer. Volatility differences stem primarily from sector tilts, with IDHQ often displaying slightly more technology and healthcare exposure compared to IQDG’s consumer and industrial emphasis.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking to compare or monitor funds like IDHQ and IQDG can leverage this platform for data-driven insights.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to IDHQ. The lower expense ratio, combined with a focused quality-factor methodology and competitive sector diversification, supports stronger long-term cost efficiency and risk-adjusted positioning within developed international equities. IQDG remains a compelling alternative for investors prioritizing dividend growth characteristics, though its higher expense ratio represents a relative disadvantage in sustained holding periods.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IDHQ vs. IQDG commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDHQ is a Hold and IQDG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDHQ has more net assets: 920M vs. IQDG (704M). IDHQ has a higher annual dividend yield than IQDG: IDHQ (23.963) vs IQDG (4.797). IDHQ was incepted earlier than IQDG: IDHQ (19 years) vs IQDG (10 years). IDHQ (0.29) has a lower expense ratio than IQDG (0.42). IQDG has a higher turnover IDHQ (41.00) vs IDHQ (41.00).
IDHQIQDGIDHQ / IQDG
Gain YTD23.9634.797500%
Net Assets920M704M131%
Total Expense Ratio0.290.4269%
Turnover41.0058.0071%
Yield2.012.4084%
Fund Existence19 years10 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDHQIQDG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDHQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IQDG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMVRX133.03N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Value R
HFMDX26.69N/A
N/A
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Inv
FCIKX18.58-0.07
-0.38%
NYLI PineStone International Eq Inv Cl
MECDX16.68-0.12
-0.71%
NYLI Epoch Capital Growth Class A
RAFGX46.59-0.54
-1.15%
American Funds AMCAP R-6

IDHQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDHQ has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IDHQ jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDHQ
1D Price
Change %
IDHQ100%
-1.06%
STM - IDHQ
70%
Closely correlated
-4.18%
BHP - IDHQ
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
RIO - IDHQ
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
MT - IDHQ
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
CP - IDHQ
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
More

IQDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IQDG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IQDG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IQDG
1D Price
Change %
IQDG100%
-0.83%
STM - IQDG
73%
Closely correlated
-4.18%
BHP - IQDG
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
RIO - IQDG
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
AIR - IQDG
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.52%
MTRN - IQDG
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.23%
More