IDNA
Price
$39.71
Change
-$0.58 (-1.44%)
Updated
Sep 4, 02:27 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
262.44M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VHT
Price
$324.78
Change
+$0.31 (+0.10%)
Updated
Sep 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
20.9B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDNA vs VHT

IDNA vs VHT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF (IDNA) vs. Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT)

Key Takeaways

  • IDNA is a thematic ETF targeting global companies in genomics, immunology, and bioengineering, while VHT provides broad exposure to the entire U.S. health care sector.
  • IDNA holds approximately 50 stocks with a concentrated focus on innovative biopharmaceutical firms, whereas VHT maintains a diversified portfolio of over 420 holdings across pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, equipment, and services.
  • IDNA carries a higher expense ratio of 0.47% compared to VHT's low-cost structure at 0.09%, reflecting its specialized strategy versus broad market replication.
  • IDNA offers international diversification with significant exposure outside the United States, while VHT remains almost entirely U.S.-focused.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed, but IDNA follows a rules-based thematic index and VHT tracks a comprehensive market-cap-weighted health care benchmark.
  • Investors seeking targeted exposure to cutting-edge life sciences innovation may prefer IDNA, whereas those prioritizing broad sector diversification and cost efficiency may favor VHT.

Introduction

Health care remains a core sector for long-term investors due to demographic shifts, technological advances, and ongoing innovation in therapeutics. The iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF (IDNA) and the Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) both provide equity exposure within this space yet pursue distinctly different strategies. IDNA delivers targeted access to genomics and immunology themes on a global basis, while VHT offers comprehensive coverage of the U.S. health care industry. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they serve as complementary or alternative tools depending on an investor's preference for thematic concentration versus broad sector representation.

iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF (IDNA) Overview

The iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF (IDNA) seeks to track the NYSE FactSet Global Genomics and Immuno Biopharma Index. This passive, rules-based fund invests in developed- and emerging-market companies positioned to benefit from long-term growth in genomics, immunology, and bioengineering. The ETF typically holds around 50 securities, resulting in a concentrated portfolio heavily weighted toward biotechnology and pharmaceutical innovators. Top holdings often include companies such as MRNA, TWST, and RVMD. Nearly all assets reside in the health care sector, with notable allocations to global names outside the United States. The expense ratio stands at 0.47%, and the fund rebalances periodically to maintain alignment with its underlying index.

Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) Overview

The Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index through a passively managed, full-replication approach. This fund provides broad exposure to large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. companies across the health care sector as classified by the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). It holds approximately 420 stocks, delivering diversified representation in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, health care equipment, life sciences tools, managed care, and related sub-industries. Prominent holdings typically feature LLY, JNJ, ABBV, UNH, and MRK. The expense ratio is 0.09%, with quarterly rebalancing to match index weights. The structure emphasizes cost efficiency and comprehensive sector coverage within the United States.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The health care sector continues to attract capital amid aging populations, rising demand for innovative therapies, and advances in precision medicine. Genomics and immunology represent high-growth niches driven by breakthroughs in gene editing, mRNA technology, and targeted biologics. Regulatory developments around drug pricing and approval pathways, along with macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate expectations, influence capital flows into both broad health care and specialized biotech segments. Supply-chain resilience and global collaboration in life sciences remain key themes, while risks include clinical trial failures, patent expirations, and policy shifts affecting reimbursement.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, IDNA has exhibited higher volatility consistent with its concentrated exposure to early-stage and growth-oriented biotech names sensitive to clinical news and sentiment shifts. VHT has delivered more stable returns anchored by large-cap pharmaceutical and managed-care leaders with predictable cash flows. Sector rotation favoring defensive health care names or growth-oriented innovation has alternately benefited each fund's relative positioning. IDNA's global reach provides diversification against purely domestic policy risks, while VHT's scale and liquidity support efficient trading across market environments.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your investment objectives.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest preference to VHT in the current environment. Its substantially lower expense ratio, greater diversification across hundreds of holdings, and established liquidity profile provide a more resilient foundation for broad health care exposure. While IDNA offers compelling access to high-conviction genomics and immunology themes with global reach, its higher cost and narrower focus introduce elevated concentration risk that may not suit all market regimes. Investors should weigh these trade-offs against individual objectives and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IDNA vs. VHT commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDNA is a Hold and VHT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VHT has more net assets: 20.9B vs. IDNA (262M). IDNA has a higher annual dividend yield than VHT: IDNA (54.488) vs VHT (12.966). IDNA was incepted earlier than VHT: IDNA (7 years) vs VHT (23 years). VHT (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than IDNA (0.47). IDNA has a higher turnover VHT (4.00) vs VHT (4.00).
IDNAVHTIDNA / VHT
Gain YTD54.48812.966420%
Net Assets262M20.9B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.470.09522%
Turnover49.004.001,225%
Yield0.721.4849%
Fund Existence7 years23 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDNAVHT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDNA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VHT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KRE74.870.63
+0.85%
State Street® SPDR® S&PRgnllBkgETF
QCLR27.770.20
+0.74%
Global X NASDAQ 100® Collar 95-110 ETF
SIXJ37.420.20
+0.54%
AllianzIM US Equity 6M Bfr10 Jan/Jul ETF
SQLV54.220.03
+0.06%
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
VGM10.07-0.01
-0.10%
Invesco Trust Investment Grade Municipals