Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IEDRX vs RMFCX
IEDRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts IEDRX vs RMFCX
IEDRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IEDRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEDRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. IEDRX (2.56B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than IEDRX: RMFCX (1.15) vs IEDRX (0.49). IEDRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: IEDRX (15 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). IEDRX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). IEDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). IEDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: IEDRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). IEDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.72 vs. RMFCX (3.69). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.60 vs. IEDRX (2.26).
| IEDRX | RMFCX | IEDRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.91 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.91 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.280 | 7.417 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 117B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.15 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.72 | 3.69 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.91 | 33.94 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.26 | 34.60 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.35 | 91.73 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers