IEZ
Price
$30.63
Change
+$0.13 (+0.43%)
Updated
Jun 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
659.11M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OIH
Price
$428.26
Change
+$2.38 (+0.56%)
Updated
Jun 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.35B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IEZ vs OIH

Header iconIEZ vs OIH Comparison
Open Charts IEZ vs OIHBanner chart's image
IEZ vs OIH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) vs. VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH)

Key Takeaways

  • Both IEZ and OIH provide targeted exposure to the oil equipment and services subsector of energy, but OIH is more concentrated with 26 holdings versus IEZ's 31–35 holdings.
  • OIH offers a lower expense ratio of 0.35% compared to IEZ's 0.38%, providing a slight cost advantage for long-term holders.
  • Top holdings overlap significantly, with SLB and BKR dominating both, but OIH allocates more heavily to these leaders (top two ~32% vs. ~45% in IEZ).
  • OIH has substantially larger assets under management (AUM) at over $2.4 billion versus IEZ's ~$600 million, enhancing liquidity.
  • Both exhibit high volatility tied to oil prices and drilling activity, but OIH's focus on the largest, most liquid firms may offer marginally better trend consistency in bullish cycles.
  • IEZ emphasizes U.S.-only equities, while OIH includes U.S.-listed global firms like TS, broadening exposure slightly.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the oilfield services subsector—critical for upstream oil and gas exploration—often compare IEZ and OIH. These passive ETFs track specialized indices of companies providing equipment, drilling, and related services, rather than direct commodity plays. They compete directly within the energy sector ETF comparison, offering alternative paths to the same thematic goal: capitalizing on rig counts, drilling efficiency, and oil price dynamics. In the current environment of geopolitical tensions, supply constraints, and sustained demand for fossil fuels amid energy transitions, both provide leveraged sensitivity to sector rotation without broad energy diversification. This ETF comparison highlights structural nuances for informed positioning.

iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) Overview

The iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) is a passive fund seeking to track the Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Equipment & Services Index, composed exclusively of U.S. equities in oil equipment and services. It holds approximately 31–35 stocks, with top holdings including SLB (~22–23%), BKR (~22%), HAL (~4.5%), FTI (~4.5%), and NOV (~4%), comprising over 70% of assets. Sector allocation is nearly 100% energy, focused on oilfield providers.

The expense ratio is 0.38%, with AUM around $600 million. As a non-diversified, market-cap-weighted ETF, it rebalances periodically to reflect index changes, emphasizing mid- to large-cap U.S. firms. Liquidity is solid, with average daily volume exceeding 600,000 shares and tight bid-ask spreads (~0.06%). Distinguishing features include pure domestic focus, making it sensitive to U.S. shale activity and Permian Basin trends.

VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) Overview

The VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) passively replicates the MVIS U.S. Listed Oil Services 25 Index, targeting the 25 largest and most liquid U.S.-listed oil services companies, including some global depositary receipts. It maintains about 26 holdings, led by SLB (~20%), BKR (~12%), HAL (~7%), FTI (~6.5%), and TS (~5%), accounting for ~71% of assets. Allocation is overwhelmingly energy-focused.

With a competitive 0.35% expense ratio and AUM surpassing $2.4 billion, the fund benefits from high liquidity (average daily volume ~500,000 shares). Market-cap-weighted and non-diversified, it rebalances to prioritize liquidity and size, capturing leaders in drilling, equipment, and offshore services. Key traits include emphasis on highly traded names and modest international flavor via U.S.-listed ADRs (American Depositary Receipts), enhancing relative positioning in global oil service cycles.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The oil equipment and services subsector underpins upstream energy production, providing rigs, drilling tools, and completion technologies amid volatile crude dynamics. Current catalysts include geopolitical tensions in the Middle East—such as disruptions near the Strait of Hormuz—and potential Venezuelan output revival post-political shifts, spurring demand for service providers. Rising U.S. LNG exports, data center power needs boosting natural gas, and sustained Permian efficiency gains drive rig activity and capital flows into oilfield firms.

Macro drivers like OPEC+ production decisions, interest rate trajectories affecting drilling budgets, and commodity supercycles favor sector momentum. Risks encompass oil price slumps from supply surpluses, regulatory pushes toward renewables, workforce shortages, and supply chain pressures on equipment. Capital discipline among exploration firms tempers growth, while tightening service capacity could lift pricing. This environment amplifies ETF exposure profiles, rewarding diversified service leaders.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have mirrored oil services' leverage to energy rallies, with year-to-date gains around 40–50% tied to crude surges from geopolitical risks. Over the past year, returns exceed 90–100%, outperforming broader energy benchmarks, driven by top holdings' earnings from heightened drilling and international contracts. Three-year annualized figures hover near 18–20%, reflecting volatility from 2022–2023 downturns and subsequent rebounds.

OIH often edges IEZ in upcycles due to heavier weighting in mega-caps like SLB and BKR, which benefit from global scale. IEZ shows similar beta but slightly broader U.S.-centric exposure, aiding in shale-focused rotations. Volatility profiles align (standard deviation ~30% over three years), amplified by sector sensitivity to rig counts, oil above $80/barrel, and earnings cycles. Relative positioning favors liquidity leaders amid capital inflows.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across sectors like energy services. Explore it today to uncover ETF comparison insights and sector exposure plays tailored to current trends.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors OIH with moderate conviction (~60% probability of outperformance over the next quarter). This stems from its cost efficiency, superior liquidity, concentrated positioning in high-momentum leaders, and larger scale amid sector uptrends. While IEZ offers solid diversification, OIH's profile aligns better with observable trend consistency and reduced expense drag in bullish oil service environments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IEZ vs. OIH commentary
Jun 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEZ is a StrongBuy and OIH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OIH has more net assets: 2.35B vs. IEZ (659M). OIH has a higher annual dividend yield than IEZ: OIH (49.552) vs IEZ (46.494). IEZ was incepted earlier than OIH: IEZ (20 years) vs OIH (14 years). OIH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IEZ (0.38). IEZ has a higher turnover OIH (21.00) vs OIH (21.00).
IEZOIHIEZ / OIH
Gain YTD46.49449.55294%
Net Assets659M2.35B28%
Total Expense Ratio0.380.35109%
Turnover25.0021.00119%
Yield1.211.16104%
Fund Existence20 years14 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IEZOIH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IEZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OIH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACEP19.810.50
+2.57%
ARS Core Equity ETF
EAOR37.500.61
+1.64%
iShares ESG Aware 60/40 Bal Allc ETF
TGRT44.710.67
+1.53%
T. Rowe Price Growth ETF
IIF21.450.27
+1.27%
Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund
CORD6.45-0.03
-0.46%
T-REX 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF

IEZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEZ has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IEZ jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEZ
1D Price
Change %
IEZ100%
+0.59%
SLB - IEZ
88%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
BKR - IEZ
85%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
NOV - IEZ
84%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
HAL - IEZ
82%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
WFRD - IEZ
80%
Closely correlated
+3.08%
More

OIH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OIH has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OIH jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OIH
1D Price
Change %
OIH100%
+0.70%
SLB - OIH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
NOV - OIH
84%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
HAL - OIH
82%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
BKR - OIH
79%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
WFRD - OIH
78%
Closely correlated
+3.08%
More