Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IFAFX vs RIDGX
IFAFX vs RIDGX Comparison
Open Charts IFAFX vs RIDGX
IFAFX vs RIDGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IFAFX vs. RIDGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFAFX is a Hold and RIDGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFAFX (147B) and RIDGX (147B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RIDGX pays higher dividends than IFAFX: RIDGX (3.73) vs IFAFX (3.40). IFAFX was incepted earlier than RIDGX: IFAFX (25 years) vs RIDGX (17 years). IFAFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RIDGX (0.26). IFAFX (65.00) and RIDGX (65.00) have comparable annual turnover. IFAFX (250) and RIDGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RIDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.21 vs. IFAFX (7.80). RIDGX return over 5 years is better than : 24.97 vs. IFAFX (22.97).
| IFAFX | RIDGX | IFAFX / RIDGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.26 | 242% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.26 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.699 | 5.870 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 147B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 3.73 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.80 | 8.21 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.45 | 36.98 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.97 | 24.97 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.16 | 63.84 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement