IFED
Price
$47.90
Change
-$3.10 (-6.08%)
Updated
Jul 31, 11:06 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
73.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UMDD
Price
$34.54
Change
-$0.13 (-0.37%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Net Assets
31.73M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFED vs UMDD

IFED vs UMDD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 31, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) vs. ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD)

Key Takeaways

  • IFED is an exchange-traded note (ETN) that follows a rules-based strategy designed to align with Federal Reserve policy signals, offering tactical macro exposure rather than broad market beta.
  • UMDD is a leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) seeking three times (3x) the daily performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index, resulting in significantly higher volatility and compounding effects over longer periods.
  • Structural differences are pronounced: IFED emphasizes a dynamic, policy-responsive approach with potentially concentrated factor tilts, while UMDD provides amplified exposure to approximately 400 mid-capitalization U.S. companies across diversified sectors.
  • Expense ratios reflect product complexity, with UMDD carrying a higher fee typical of leveraged products and IFED structured as an ETN with credit risk from the issuer.
  • Risk profiles diverge sharply: UMDD exhibits elevated daily reset risk and potential for substantial drawdowns in sideways or volatile markets, whereas IFED's performance hinges on the accuracy of its Fed-signal methodology.
  • Neither product competes directly; they serve distinct investor objectives, with IFED suited for macro-tactical allocation and UMDD for short-term directional mid-cap leverage.

Introduction

Investors seeking differentiated U.S. equity exposure often compare products with contrasting risk and strategy profiles. ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) represent two such approaches. IFED employs a thematic strategy tied to Federal Reserve actions, while UMDD delivers leveraged mid-cap market exposure. They do not target identical benchmarks or investor time horizons, yet both appeal to those navigating sector rotation and macroeconomic shifts. This comparison highlights their structural distinctions to aid informed positioning decisions.

ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) Overview

ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) tracks the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index Total Return, a rules-based strategy that adjusts exposure based on signals derived from Federal Reserve policy and economic indicators. As an ETN, it carries issuer credit risk from UBS AG rather than holding underlying securities. Holdings are determined by the index methodology, typically emphasizing large-cap U.S. equities with factor exposures responsive to monetary conditions. The product features a single-structure design without traditional rebalancing of physical assets. Its expense ratio is competitive for thematic ETNs, focusing on cost efficiency for macro-driven strategies. Distinguishing features include the dynamic alignment with Fed actions, which differentiates it from static passive benchmarks.

ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) Overview

ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times (3x) the daily performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. This leveraged ETF holds a portfolio of swaps, futures, and other derivatives to achieve the target multiple, with holdings reflecting exposure to roughly 400 mid-capitalization U.S. companies. Sector allocations mirror the underlying index, spanning industrials, financials, consumer discretionary, information technology, and healthcare among others. The expense ratio is elevated due to leverage mechanics. UMDD resets leverage daily, introducing compounding effects that can cause returns to diverge from the stated multiple over periods longer than one day. Key structural traits include high liquidity for short-term trading and explicit amplification of mid-cap volatility.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The mid-capitalization segment and macro-policy themes continue to influence U.S. equity markets amid evolving interest-rate expectations and economic data releases. Mid-cap companies often exhibit sensitivity to domestic growth cycles, credit conditions, and sector-specific earnings trends. Federal Reserve communications on monetary policy remain a central driver, affecting capital allocation across risk assets. Leveraged products like UMDD amplify these dynamics, while policy-responsive strategies such as IFED aim to capitalize on shifts in rate paths or quantitative measures. Broader risks include potential volatility from inflation readings, labor market reports, and geopolitical developments that could alter risk sentiment. Capital flows into factor and leveraged vehicles reflect ongoing demand for tools that address both tactical macro views and amplified beta exposure.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, leveraged mid-cap exposure through UMDD has shown pronounced sensitivity to short-term equity rallies and corrections, with daily resets contributing to path dependency. IFED's performance has been shaped by the effectiveness of its Fed-signal framework during periods of policy clarity or uncertainty. Relative positioning favors UMDD for investors seeking amplified participation in mid-cap rebounds driven by earnings momentum or sector rotation, whereas IFED may offer more measured responses to macroeconomic turning points. Volatility differences are structural: UMDD's leverage magnifies both gains and losses, while IFED's index methodology introduces its own variability tied to signal accuracy. Over broader timeframes, these characteristics underscore distinct roles in portfolios balancing growth amplification against policy-adaptive exposure.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to enhance your research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of suitability to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) for investors prioritizing cost-efficient macro alignment and lower structural leverage risk. UMDD’s amplified daily target and associated compounding dynamics introduce elevated volatility that may suit only specific short-term mandates. The assessment rests on diversification characteristics, expense considerations, and alignment with prevailing policy-driven market drivers rather than any guarantee of outcomes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IFED vs. UMDD commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFED is a Buy and UMDD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFED has more net assets: 73.1M vs. UMDD (31.7M). UMDD has a higher annual dividend yield than IFED: UMDD (35.458) vs IFED (10.026). IFED was incepted earlier than UMDD: IFED (5 years) vs UMDD (16 years).
IFEDUMDDIFED / UMDD
Gain YTD10.02635.45828%
Net Assets73.1M31.7M231%
Total Expense RatioN/A0.95-
TurnoverN/A67.00-
Yield0.000.69-
Fund Existence5 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFEDUMDD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UMDD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NCEL3.510.16
+4.78%
NewcelX Ltd.
PECO42.490.05
+0.12%
Phillips Edison & Company
E55.56N/A
N/A
ENI SpA
ORBS0.60-0.01
-0.97%
Eightco Holdings Inc.
GPRE16.85-0.43
-2.49%
Green Plains