IFED
Price
$44.05
Change
-$1.99 (-4.32%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
73.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UYM
Price
$30.73
Change
-$0.18 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
40.71M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFED vs UYM

IFED vs UYM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) vs. ProShares Ultra Materials (UYM)

Key Takeaways

  • IFED employs a rules-based, active strategy selecting large-cap U.S. equities positioned to benefit from prevailing Federal Reserve monetary policy signals combined with firm-specific fundamentals, while UYM delivers 2x daily leveraged exposure to the materials sector.
  • IFED maintains lower costs with a 0.45% expense ratio as an exchange-traded note (ETN) backed by issuer credit, contrasting with UYM’s 0.95% net expense ratio as a leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) using derivatives for amplified returns.
  • Holdings profiles differ markedly: IFED features a concentrated selection of approximately 50 large-cap names across multiple sectors with top positions including Warner Bros. Discovery Inc (WBD), Snowflake Inc (SNOW), and Gilead Sciences Inc (GILD); UYM tracks roughly 26 materials companies, with top exposures to Linde plc (LIN), Newmont Corp (NEM), and Freeport-McMoRan Inc (FCX).
  • Sector exposure for IFED spans broad large-cap blend categories with dynamic weighting, whereas UYM concentrates exclusively on materials industries such as chemicals, metals and mining, and construction materials.
  • Risk profiles reflect structural distinctions: IFED offers unleveraged, policy-adaptive equity exposure with credit risk from the ETN issuer, while UYM introduces significant volatility from daily leverage reset and compounding effects over multi-day periods.
  • Both vehicles suit distinct investor objectives—IFED for tactical large-cap allocation responsive to monetary conditions and UYM for short-term amplified materials sector participation.

Introduction

Investors seeking differentiated equity exposure often compare products like IFED and UYM because they target distinct segments of the U.S. equity market. IFED provides adaptive large-cap exposure influenced by Federal Reserve policy, while UYM offers leveraged access to the cyclical materials sector. These exchange-traded products do not compete directly; instead, they serve as complementary or alternative tools for investors pursuing either broad, policy-responsive large-cap strategies or concentrated, amplified sector bets within the same overall equity allocation framework.

ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) Overview

IFED is an exchange-traded note (ETN) issued by UBS that seeks to track the performance of the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index Total Return, less a 0.45% annual tracking fee. The underlying index uses a transparent, rules-based methodology incorporating Federal Reserve monetary policy signals and twelve firm-specific metrics to select and weight large-cap U.S. equities expected to benefit from prevailing economic conditions. The ETN holds no underlying securities and instead represents unsecured debt of the issuer, exposing investors to credit risk. It features a dynamic portfolio of roughly 50 holdings, with recent top positions including Warner Bros. Discovery Inc (WBD), Snowflake Inc (SNOW), Gilead Sciences Inc (GILD), Bristol-Myers Squibb Co (BMY), and 3M Co (MMM). Sector allocations span multiple industries consistent with large-blend characteristics rather than a single thematic focus. The product launched in September 2021 and maintains a long maturity date extending to 2061.

ProShares Ultra Materials (UYM) Overview

UYM is a leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) from ProShares designed to deliver two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P Materials Select Sector Index before fees and expenses. The fund achieves this objective primarily through total return swaps and other derivatives, with daily rebalancing to reset leverage. It carries a net expense ratio of 0.95%. The underlying index comprises approximately 26 companies in the materials sector, encompassing chemicals, metals and mining, construction materials, containers and packaging, and paper and forest products. Recent top holdings include Linde plc (LIN), Newmont Corp (NEM), Freeport-McMoRan Inc (FCX), CRH plc (CRH), and Vulcan Materials Co (VMC). As a daily-reset leveraged product, UYM is structured for short-term trading horizons, with potential for significant deviation from the stated multiple over longer periods due to compounding and volatility effects. The ETF launched in January 2007.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The broader environment features ongoing monetary policy transitions and sector rotation between defensive large-cap equities and cyclical materials exposure. Materials companies remain sensitive to commodity price trends, global industrial demand, infrastructure spending, and supply-chain developments. Regulatory and macroeconomic drivers, including potential shifts in interest rates and trade policies, influence both the large-cap universe targeted by IFED and the input-cost and revenue dynamics within the materials sector covered by UYM. Capital flows into thematic and leveraged products continue amid investor focus on inflation hedging and economic recovery themes, though both strategies carry elevated risks during periods of heightened market volatility.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, IFED has exhibited characteristics typical of actively selected large-cap blend exposure, with returns influenced by the index’s responsiveness to Federal Reserve signals and earnings trends among its holdings. UYM has delivered amplified moves aligned with materials sector performance, benefiting from commodity rallies or industrial rebounds but also experiencing sharper drawdowns during sector rotations or economic slowdowns. Relative positioning highlights IFED’s broader diversification and lower structural costs versus UYM’s concentrated, high-beta exposure that magnifies both upside and downside volatility. Over multi-week and multi-month periods, performance differences have stemmed from sector rotation patterns, earnings cycles in technology and healthcare holdings for IFED, and commodity price fluctuations for UYM.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking additional analysis on products like IFED and UYM may find the AI Screener a valuable resource for idea generation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to IFED for investors prioritizing cost efficiency, broad large-cap diversification, and an adaptive strategy responsive to monetary policy shifts. UYM may appeal more to those seeking targeted, leveraged materials exposure during periods of sector strength, though its higher expense ratio and daily-reset mechanics introduce greater complexity and risk. This assessment rests on relative cost structures, diversification profiles, and alignment with prevailing macroeconomic drivers rather than short-term price movements.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IFED vs. UYM commentary
Jun 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFED is a Hold and UYM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFED has more net assets: 73.1M vs. UYM (40.7M). UYM has a higher annual dividend yield than IFED: UYM (25.843) vs IFED (-4.968). IFED was incepted earlier than UYM: IFED (5 years) vs UYM (19 years).
IFEDUYMIFED / UYM
Gain YTD-4.96825.843-19%
Net Assets73.1M40.7M180%
Total Expense RatioN/A0.95-
TurnoverN/A42.00-
Yield0.001.23-
Fund Existence5 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFEDUYM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UYM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNGZX17.28N/A
N/A
Franklin Intl Growth Adv
MSIBX22.71N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq A
RISIX14.39N/A
N/A
RBC International Small Cap Equity I
OMSCX26.28N/A
N/A
Invesco Main Street All Cap C
JIGHX39.81N/A
N/A
JHancock International Growth NAV

UYM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UYM has been closely correlated with CC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UYM jumps, then CC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UYM
1D Price
Change %
UYM100%
-0.59%
CC - UYM
79%
Closely correlated
-2.90%
ESI - UYM
77%
Closely correlated
-4.32%
CMC - UYM
76%
Closely correlated
-6.60%
AA - UYM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
WLK - UYM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
More