Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IFUTX vs RMEBX
IFUTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts IFUTX vs RMEBX
IFUTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IFUTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFUTX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. IFUTX (3.69B). IFUTX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: IFUTX (1.50) vs RMEBX (1.04). IFUTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: IFUTX (14 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than IFUTX (0.60). IFUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than IFUTX: RMEBX (250) vs IFUTX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.98 vs. IFUTX (4.89). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. IFUTX (13.88).
| IFUTX | RMEBX | IFUTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.07 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.07 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.984 | 5.801 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 115B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.04 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | 9.98 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.13 | 34.14 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.88 | 32.93 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.65 | 89.84 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement