Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IGMSX vs NPFCX
IGMSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts IGMSX vs NPFCX
IGMSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IGMSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IGMSX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. IGMSX (956M). IGMSX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: IGMSX (0.83) vs NPFCX (0.33). IGMSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: IGMSX (24 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than IGMSX (1.18). IGMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). IGMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: IGMSX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. IGMSX (-7.45). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.89 vs. IGMSX (-68.30).
| IGMSX | NPFCX | IGMSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.47 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.47 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.938 | 5.984 | -183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 956M | 172B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.33 | 252% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.45 | 7.68 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | -53.83 | 36.76 | -146% |
| Returns for 5 years | -68.30 | 10.89 | -627% |
| Returns for 10 years | -47.93 | 102.99 | -47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement