Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IGMSX vs NPFCX
IGMSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts IGMSX vs NPFCX
IGMSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IGMSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IGMSX is a Buy and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. IGMSX (887M). IGMSX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: IGMSX (0.73) vs NPFCX (0.33). IGMSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: IGMSX (24 years) vs NPFCX (26 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than IGMSX (1.18). IGMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). IGMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: IGMSX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.83 vs. IGMSX (-10.15). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.04 vs. IGMSX (-70.11).
| IGMSX | NPFCX | IGMSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.47 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.47 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.872 | 6.030 | -230% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 887M | 169B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.33 | 224% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.15 | 2.83 | -359% |
| Returns for 3 years | -49.96 | 35.62 | -140% |
| Returns for 5 years | -70.11 | 6.04 | -1,161% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.04 | 98.13 | -50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement