IGV
Price
$101.85
Change
-$0.60 (-0.59%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
14.26B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VGT
Price
$117.51
Change
+$1.09 (+0.94%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
160.62B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IGV vs VGT

IGV vs VGT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) vs. Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT)

Key Takeaways

  • IGV provides concentrated exposure to the software industry within technology, while VGT offers broad diversification across the entire information technology sector.
  • IGV holds approximately 106 securities with top positions concentrated in software leaders; VGT tracks around 324 holdings with significant weights in semiconductors and hardware.
  • VGT features a substantially lower expense ratio of 0.09% compared to IGV’s 0.38%, enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • Both ETFs follow passive indexing strategies but target distinct slices of the technology universe, resulting in differentiated risk and return profiles tied to software versus broader tech cycles.
  • IGV’s thematic focus on application and systems software creates higher sector-specific volatility, whereas VGT’s market-cap weighting provides more balanced exposure to hardware, semiconductors, and services.
  • Structural differences position the funds as complementary rather than direct competitors within technology sector allocation strategies.

Introduction

Investors seeking technology exposure often evaluate specialized versus broad-sector ETFs to align portfolios with specific objectives. The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) both deliver U.S.-focused technology equity exposure but pursue different strategies. IGV narrows its mandate to software and select interactive media companies, while VGT encompasses the full information technology sector, including semiconductors and hardware. These distinctions make the pair relevant for comparing thematic concentration against diversified sector participation in the current environment of ongoing technological innovation and capital allocation shifts.

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) Overview

The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) seeks to track the S&P North American Technology-Software Index, which measures the performance of North American equities primarily in the software industry along with select interactive media and services firms. The fund holds approximately 106 securities and maintains a passive indexing approach with market-cap weighting and periodic rebalancing. Top holdings typically include PANW, MSFT, PLTR, CRWD, and ORCL, with the top ten positions accounting for roughly 60% of assets. Sector allocation centers overwhelmingly on information technology, with application software representing about 53% and systems software around 43%. The expense ratio stands at 0.38%. This structure delivers targeted software-sector exposure with moderate concentration risk.

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) Overview

The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index, providing exposure to large-, mid-, and small-capitalization U.S. companies classified in the information technology sector. The fund contains approximately 324 holdings and employs a passive, market-capitalization-weighted methodology with quarterly rebalancing. Top holdings commonly feature NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AVGO, and MU, with the top ten representing about 62% of assets. Nearly 99% of the portfolio resides in information technology, spanning semiconductors, hardware, software, and related services. The expense ratio is 0.09%. This construction supports broad, diversified participation across the technology landscape.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from sustained demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and digital transformation initiatives. Capital flows into both software platforms and semiconductor supply chains reflect enterprise and consumer adoption of advanced technologies. Regulatory developments around data privacy, export controls on advanced chips, and antitrust scrutiny of dominant platforms introduce ongoing considerations for sector participants. Macroeconomic drivers such as interest rate trajectories and corporate capital expenditure cycles influence investment pacing across hardware and software segments. Risks include supply chain disruptions, valuation compression in high-growth areas, and potential shifts in global technology spending patterns.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, IGV has exhibited greater sensitivity to software earnings trends and cybersecurity spending patterns, leading to periods of outperformance when those themes dominate investor focus. VGT has demonstrated more balanced behavior tied to broader technology demand, including semiconductor cycles and hardware innovation. Relative positioning shows IGV carrying higher concentration risk that can amplify volatility during software-specific rotations, while VGT’s wider holdings provide some buffering through diversified exposure. Both funds respond to common macro factors such as earnings growth in technology leaders and shifts in risk appetite, yet their distinct compositions result in differentiated drawdown profiles and recovery dynamics across varying market regimes.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors evaluating sector ETFs like IGV and VGT may find the tool useful for refining broader market scans.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to VGT. The ETF’s materially lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 324 holdings, and comprehensive coverage of the information technology sector support more consistent risk-adjusted participation in sector momentum compared with IGV’s narrower software focus and higher costs. This assessment rests on cost efficiency, diversification profile, and relative positioning within prevailing technology trends rather than short-term performance outcomes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IGV vs. VGT commentary
Aug 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IGV is a Hold and VGT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGT has more net assets: 161B vs. IGV (14.3B). VGT has a higher annual dividend yield than IGV: VGT (23.706) vs IGV (-3.048). IGV was incepted earlier than VGT: IGV (25 years) vs VGT (23 years). VGT (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than IGV (0.39). IGV has a higher turnover VGT (8.00) vs VGT (8.00).
IGVVGTIGV / VGT
Gain YTD-3.04823.706-13%
Net Assets14.3B161B9%
Total Expense Ratio0.390.09433%
Turnover20.008.00250%
Yield0.020.385%
Fund Existence25 years23 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IGVVGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IGV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VGT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MYY15.240.13
+0.85%
ProShares Short MidCap400
BLW12.710.04
+0.32%
Blackrock Limited
MUSE49.72N/A
N/A
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF
FHLC84.61-0.05
-0.06%
Fidelity MSCI Health Care ETF
GOEX95.99-0.19
-0.20%
Global X Gold Explorers ETF

IGV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGV has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IGV jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGV
1D Price
Change %
IGV100%
-0.89%
CRM - IGV
74%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
ASAN - IGV
70%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
ESTC - IGV
70%
Closely correlated
-3.14%
DSGX - IGV
69%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
ZETA - IGV
69%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
More

VGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VGT has been closely correlated with ENTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VGT jumps, then ENTG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VGT
1D Price
Change %
VGT100%
-1.69%
ENTG - VGT
71%
Closely correlated
-3.77%
CEVA - VGT
71%
Closely correlated
-4.68%
AMD - VGT
70%
Closely correlated
-3.49%
ONTO - VGT
70%
Closely correlated
-3.55%
RMBS - VGT
68%
Closely correlated
-4.57%
More