Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IILGX vs RWIFX
IILGX vs RWIFX Comparison
Open Charts IILGX vs RWIFX
IILGX vs RWIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IILGX vs. RWIFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IILGX is a Hold and RWIFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. IILGX (2.53B). RWIFX pays higher dividends than IILGX: RWIFX (1.57) vs IILGX (1.37). IILGX was incepted earlier than RWIFX: IILGX (29 years) vs RWIFX (24 years). IILGX (0.64) is less costly to investors than RWIFX (0.46). IILGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RWIFX (44.00). RWIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IILGX: RWIFX (250) vs IILGX (2000). RWIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.26 vs. IILGX (16.57). RWIFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.12 vs. IILGX (13.36).
| IILGX | RWIFX | IILGX / RWIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.46 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.46 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.475 | 15.808 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 160B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.57 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.57 | 22.26 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.09 | 54.76 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.36 | 37.12 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.92 | 112.87 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement