Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ILCB vs RECS
ILCB vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts ILCB vs RECS
ILCB vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILCB vs. RECS commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILCB is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.72B vs. ILCB (1.27B). ILCB has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: ILCB (10.214) vs RECS (5.901). ILCB was incepted earlier than RECS: ILCB (22 years) vs RECS (7 years). ILCB (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS has a higher turnover ILCB (4.00) vs ILCB (4.00).
| ILCB | RECS | ILCB / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 10.214 | 5.901 | 173% |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 5.72B | 22% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.15 | 20% |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 32.00 | 13% |
| Yield | 0.97 | 0.74 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ILCB | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ILCB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILCB has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ILCB jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILCB | 100% | +1.21% | ||
| MSFT - ILCB | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| AVGO - ILCB | 62% Loosely correlated | +4.70% | ||
| AAPL - ILCB | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| AMZN - ILCB | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| META - ILCB | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
More | ||||