Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ILCB vs RECS
ILCB vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts ILCB vs RECS
ILCB vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILCB vs. RECS commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILCB is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 6.09B vs. ILCB (1.31B). ILCB has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: ILCB (12.794) vs RECS (10.602). ILCB was incepted earlier than RECS: ILCB (22 years) vs RECS (7 years). ILCB (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS has a higher turnover ILCB (8.00) vs ILCB (8.00).
| ILCB | RECS | ILCB / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 12.794 | 10.602 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 6.09B | 21% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.15 | 20% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 32.00 | 25% |
| Yield | 0.96 | 0.71 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ILCB | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 6 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 6 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 6 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 6 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 6 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 9 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FXZ | 86.20 | 0.18 | +0.21% |
| First Trust Materials AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| PBQQ | 31.46 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM LADDERED NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF | |||
| XIMR | 31.35 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Buf & Prm Inc ETF - Mar | |||
| TMF | 30.85 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| Direxion Daily 20+ Yr Trsy Bull 3X ETF | |||
| XSPI | 49.43 | -0.33 | -0.67% |
| NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF | |||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.93% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
More | ||||