Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ILGCX vs RGACX
ILGCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ILGCX vs RGACX
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Gr A
Price$23.20
Change+$0.16 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets216.98M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.97
Change+$0.86 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
ILGCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILGCX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILGCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. ILGCX (217M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ILGCX: RGACX (0.07) vs ILGCX (0.00). ILGCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ILGCX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). ILGCX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). ILGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ILGCX: RGACX (250) vs ILGCX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.25 vs. ILGCX (9.87). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.70 vs. ILGCX (8.18).
| ILGCX | RGACX | ILGCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.94 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.94 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.628 | 15.252 | 57% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 217M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.87 | 17.25 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.82 | 57.45 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.18 | 39.70 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.64 | 100.18 | 48% |