Ad is loading...
ILGCX vs RGACX
ILGCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ILGCX vs RGACX
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Gr A
Price$19.82
Change+$0.12 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.99M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.16
Change+$0.52 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
ILGCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILGCX vs. RGACX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILGCX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. ILGCX (194M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ILGCX: RGACX (0.08) vs ILGCX (0.00). ILGCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ILGCX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). ILGCX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). ILGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ILGCX: RGACX (250) vs ILGCX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.09 vs. ILGCX (-2.38). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.06 vs. ILGCX (10.22).
| ILGCX | RGACX | ILGCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.94 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.94 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.119 | -2.542 | 280% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 194M | 284B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.38 | 3.09 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.00 | 32.79 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.22 | 42.06 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.41 | 58.28 | 33% |